Larbi-Odam and Others v Member of the Eexecutive Council for Education (North-West Province) and Another (CCT2/97) [1997] ZACC 16; 1997 (12) BCLR 1655; 1998 (1) SA 745 (26 November 1997)
Regulation 2(2) of the Regulations regarding the Terms and Conditions of Employment of Education, which bars non-citizens from permanent educator posts, constitutes unfair discrimination against permanent residents under section 8(2) of the interim Constitution. Citizenship is an attribute that is difficult to change and is not within the individual's control, making non-citizens a vulnerable group. The regulation impairs the dignity and security of permanent residents, who have been lawfully admitted and often reside in South Africa for extended periods. The government's commitment to permanent residents is undermined by excluding them from employment opportunities. The discrimination is...
- Citation
- [1997] ZACC 16
- Parties
- Appellant: Charles Kweku Larbi-Odam; Appellant: Gabriel Kofi Tuglo; Appellant: Joseph Yeboa Akwa; Appellant: Ephraim Kwaku Adom; Appellant: Lawrence Ntungwana Simelane; Appellant: Nkhane Andries Ramakgapola; Appellant: Kwabena Amoakohene-Ababio; Appellant: Moses Samuel Kiirya Ntende; Respondent: The Member of the Executive Council for Education (North-West Province); Respondent: The Minister of Education
- Court
- Constitutional Court
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 26 November 1997
- Case Number
- CCT 2/97
- Procedural Posture
- Constitutional Appeal / Appeal From Bophuthatswana Provincial Division of the Supreme Court
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed. Regulation 2(2) declared inconsistent with the Constitution and invalid. Respondents ordered to pay costs.
- Judges
- Mokgoro, Chaskalson, Langa, Ackermann, Didcott, Goldstone, Kriegler, Madala, O'Regan, Sachs
- Legal Topics
- Unfair Discrimination, Citizenship and Employment, Section 8 Equality, Section 33 Limitation, Educators Employment Act, Aliens Control Act
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Charles Kweku Larbi-Odam
Appellant
Gabriel Kofi Tuglo
Appellant
Joseph Yeboa Akwa
Appellant
Ephraim Kwaku Adom
Appellant
Lawrence Ntungwana Simelane
Appellant
Nkhane Andries Ramakgapola
Appellant
Kwabena Amoakohene-Ababio
Appellant
Moses Samuel Kiirya Ntende
Appellant
The Member of the Executive Council for Education (North-West Province)
Respondent
The Minister of Education
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Constitutional Appeal / Appeal From Bophuthatswana Provincial Division of the Supreme Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Does regulation 2(2) of the Regulations regarding the Terms and Conditions of Employment of Education unlawfully discriminate against non-citizens contrary to section 8(2) of the interim Constitution?
- 2 Is regulation 2(2) ultra vires the enabling Educators' Employment Act 138 of 1994?
- 3 Is any discrimination justified under section 33(1) of the interim Constitution?
Ratio Decidendi
Regulation 2(2) of the Regulations regarding the Terms and Conditions of Employment of Education, which bars non-citizens from permanent educator posts, constitutes unfair discrimination against permanent residents under section 8(2) of the interim Constitution. Citizenship is an attribute that is difficult to change and is not within the individual's control, making non-citizens a vulnerable group. The regulation impairs the dignity and security of permanent residents, who have been lawfully admitted and often reside in South Africa for extended periods. The government's commitment to permanent residents is undermined by excluding them from employment opportunities. The discrimination is...
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed. Regulation 2(2) declared inconsistent with the Constitution and invalid. Respondents ordered to pay costs.
Orders
- Regulation 2(2) of the Regulations regarding the Terms and Conditions of Employment of Education in Government Gazette 16814 GN R1743 of 13 November 1995 is declared inconsistent with the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa Act 200 of 1993 and invalid.
- Respondents are ordered to pay the applicants' costs, including costs attendant on the employment of two counsel.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment