L.R v P.R (14/2/2018) [2018] ZAWCHC 19; 2018 (3) SA 507 (WCC) (14 February 2018)

L.R v P.R (14/2/2018) [2018] ZAWCHC 19; 2018 (3) SA 507 (WCC) (14 February 2018)

The respondent has failed for over a decade to comply with the terms of the consent paper incorporated into the divorce order, specifically regarding the transfer of the jointly owned property. His explanations for delay are unconvincing and unsupported by evidence, and any further indulgence would prejudice the applicant and undermine the finality of litigation. The court finds that the respondent has been afforded sufficient opportunity and that the clean break principle requires finality in proprietary matters post-divorce. The respondent is ordered to effect transfer within 60 days, failing which the property will be sold at auction. Costs are awarded to the applicant, but not on a...

Citation
[2018] ZAWCHC 19
Parties
Applicant: L R; Respondent: P R
Court
Western Cape High Court, Cape Town
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
14 February 2018
Case Number
11463/17
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / Judgment After Opposed Application and Rule 6(11) Interlocutory
Outcome
Application granted in part; respondent ordered to effect transfer within 60 days, failing which property to be sold at auction; costs awarded to applicant.
Judges
Andrews AJ
Legal Topics
Consent Paper Enforcement, Clean Break Principle, Transfer of Immovable Property, Divorce Order Compliance, Costs Award
Family and Children Land and Property Consent Paper Enforcement Clean Break Principle Transfer of Immovable Property Divorce Order Compliance Costs Award

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 9 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 10
Sign in to unlock

Parties

L R

Applicant

P R

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Application / Judgment After Opposed Application and Rule 6(11) Interlocutory

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the respondent should be compelled to effect transfer of the jointly owned immovable property to himself within a reasonable period as per the consent paper.
  2. 2 Whether the respondent's request for further indulgence to delay transfer is justified.
  3. 3 Whether a punitive costs order should be granted against the respondent.

Ratio Decidendi

The respondent has failed for over a decade to comply with the terms of the consent paper incorporated into the divorce order, specifically regarding the transfer of the jointly owned property. His explanations for delay are unconvincing and unsupported by evidence, and any further indulgence would prejudice the applicant and undermine the finality of litigation. The court finds that the respondent has been afforded sufficient opportunity and that the clean break principle requires finality in proprietary matters post-divorce. The respondent is ordered to effect transfer within 60 days, failing which the property will be sold at auction. Costs are awarded to the applicant, but not on a...

Court Disposition

Application granted in part; respondent ordered to effect transfer within 60 days, failing which property to be sold at auction; costs awarded to applicant.

Orders

  • The respondent is directed to effect transfer of the immovable property situated at [...] R. Road, Parklands, registered in the names of applicant and respondent as joint owners in undivided share, within 60 calendar days of this order.
  • The respondent shall be liable for all outstanding amounts due in respect of municipal accounts, clearance certificates, outstanding bond amounts, transfer duties (if applicable), conveyancing costs, and any other amount payable to effect transfer into respondent's name.