J.G.C v G.A.C (Appeal) (CA139/2023) [2025] ZAECMKHC 44 (13 May 2025)
Court
Eastern Cape High Court, Makhanda
Case number
CA139/2023
Judges
Majiki, Bands
The High Court upheld an appeal against an order compelling sale of jointly owned former matrimonial property, finding no proven breach of the deed of settlement.
S.T.H v A.T.H (060610/22) [2024] ZAGPPHC 1237 (28 November 2024)
Court
North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
Case number
060610/22
Judge
GN Moshoana
The court found that the plaintiff failed to discharge the onus of proving a need for lifelong spousal maintenance. Both parties possess existing and prospective means to support themselves following the breakdown of the marriage. The plaintiff is economically independent, has multiple sources of income, and her financial difficulties stem from her own irresponsibility rather than any inability to earn. She did not provide full disclosure of her earnings, undermining her claim. The defendant's business is struggling, and his health issues impose significant financial obligations. The plaintif…
M.M v M.A (Born N) (562/2021) [2023] ZALMPTHC 8 (31 August 2023)
Court
Limpopo High Court, Thohoyandou
Case number
562/2021
Judge
IM Khosa
The court awarded the defendant rehabilitative spousal maintenance of R2,000 per month for 36 months, finding she lacked current means but had future prospects.
M N v F N (714/2018) [2019] ZASCA 185; 2020 (2) SA 410 (SCA) (3 December 2019)
Court
Supreme Court of Appeal
Case number
714/2018
Judges
Petse, Leach, Swain, Mbatha, Dolamo
The Supreme Court of Appeal held that the reference to 'pension fund' in the divorce order, interpreted in the context of the Divorce Act and Pension Funds Act, included both the pension and provident fund sections of the University of Limpopo Retirement Fund. The statutory definitions and the object of providing annuities or lump sum payments encompass both types of funds. No variation of the original order was necessary; a declaratory order sufficed to clarify entitlement. The fund administrator's role was administrative, and non-joinder was not fatal, especially as the administrator abided…
V S v S S (37350/2015) [2018] ZAGPJHC 617 (12 September 2018)
Court
South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
Case number
37350/2015
Judge
MIA
Divorce case on forfeiture, maintenance, and costs after an eight-month marriage. The court granted forfeiture and dismissed the defendant’s maintenance and contract-enforcement claims.
S.V v H.V (19579/2013) [2017] ZAGPPHC 942 (8 December 2017)
Court
North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
Case number
19579/2013
Judge
Petersen
Divorce court held that a wife in a pre-1984 antenuptial marriage had substantially contributed to her husband’s estate and awarded her 50% redistribution.