Ludick v First National Bank, A Division of Firstrand Bank Limited (NCT/112239/2018/141(1)(b)) [2019] ZANCT 28 (27 February 2019)
The Tribunal found that the matter is of substantial importance to both parties and that the applicant has reasonable prospects of success in her complaint. The Tribunal determined that there is a reasonable possibility that the respondent failed to take reasonable steps to assess the applicant's financial means and obligations, particularly regarding the methods used to calculate income and living expenses. The Tribunal held that the applicant satisfied the requirements for granting leave under section 141(1) of the National Credit Act. The points in limine raised by the respondent were not decided at this stage and will be addressed during the hearing of the main matter.
- Citation
- [2019] ZANCT 28
- Parties
- Applicant: Annet Ludick; Respondent: First National Bank, A Division of Firstrand Bank Limited
- Court
- National Consumer Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 27 February 2019
- Case Number
- NCT/112239/2018/141(1)(b)
- Procedural Posture
- Leave to Refer / Application for Leave to Refer Complaint to Tribunal Under S141(1) NCA
- Outcome
- Leave to refer granted.
- Judges
- A Potwana, M Nkomo, F Manamela
- Legal Topics
- National Credit Act, Reckless Lending, Affordability Assessment, Leave to Self Refer, Over Indebtedness
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Annet Ludick
Applicant
First National Bank, A Division of Firstrand Bank Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Leave to Refer / Application for Leave to Refer Complaint to Tribunal Under S141(1) NCA
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant should be granted leave to refer her complaint of reckless lending directly to the Tribunal.
- 2 Whether the applicant has reasonable prospects of success in proving that the respondent failed to comply with the National Credit Act's affordability assessment requirements.
- 3 Whether the respondent's points in limine preclude the granting of leave to refer.
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found that the matter is of substantial importance to both parties and that the applicant has reasonable prospects of success in her complaint. The Tribunal determined that there is a reasonable possibility that the respondent failed to take reasonable steps to assess the applicant's financial means and obligations, particularly regarding the methods used to calculate income and living expenses. The Tribunal held that the applicant satisfied the requirements for granting leave under section 141(1) of the National Credit Act. The points in limine raised by the respondent were not decided at this stage and will be addressed during the hearing of the main matter.
Court Disposition
Leave to refer granted.
Orders
- The applicant is granted leave to refer her complaint directly to the Tribunal.
- No order as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment