Malesa v DMC Debt Management, A Division of OPCO 365 (Pty) Ltd (NCT/226906/2022/141(1)(b)) [2023] ZANCT 9 (12 January 2023)
The Tribunal found that the Respondent failed to comply with multiple provisions of the National Credit Act and its Regulations, including attempting to collect a prescribed debt, failing to notify the Applicant prior to adverse credit listing, and reloading the negative listing after previously removing it. The Respondent's failure to oppose the application resulted in all allegations being deemed admitted. The Tribunal concluded that the Respondent's conduct constituted prohibited conduct under the NCA and ordered the immediate removal of the adverse listing from all credit bureaus. The Tribunal also clarified that the Applicant is entitled to approach the Chairperson for a certificate...
- Citation
- [2023] ZANCT 9
- Parties
- Applicant: Matome Piet Malesa; Respondent: DMC Debt Management, A Division of OPCO 365 (Pty) Ltd
- Court
- National Consumer Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 12 January 2023
- Case Number
- NCT/226906/2022/141(1)(b)
- Procedural Posture
- Default Application / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Application granted. The Respondent's conduct declared prohibited and adverse listing to be removed.
- Judges
- P Manzi-Ntshingila, A Potwana, S Mbhele
- Legal Topics
- National Credit Act, Prescription of Debt, Adverse Credit Listing, Prohibited Conduct, Consumer Rights, Credit Bureau Notification
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Matome Piet Malesa
Applicant
DMC Debt Management, A Division of OPCO 365 (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Default Application / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Respondent contravened the National Credit Act and its Regulations by blacklisting the Applicant without proper notification.
- 2 Whether the Respondent attempted to collect a prescribed debt in contravention of the NCA.
- 3 Whether the Respondent failed to comply with its conditions of registration and the requirements for fair treatment of consumers.
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found that the Respondent failed to comply with multiple provisions of the National Credit Act and its Regulations, including attempting to collect a prescribed debt, failing to notify the Applicant prior to adverse credit listing, and reloading the negative listing after previously removing it. The Respondent's failure to oppose the application resulted in all allegations being deemed admitted. The Tribunal concluded that the Respondent's conduct constituted prohibited conduct under the NCA and ordered the immediate removal of the adverse listing from all credit bureaus. The Tribunal also clarified that the Applicant is entitled to approach the Chairperson for a certificate...
Court Disposition
Application granted. The Respondent's conduct declared prohibited and adverse listing to be removed.
Orders
- The Respondent is declared to have contravened specified provisions of the National Credit Act, its Regulations, and its General Conditions of Registration.
- The Respondent's conduct is declared prohibited.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment