Marweshe and Others v City of Tshwane Metropolitan Municipality and Others (JR82/2024) [2024] ZALCJHB 543 (9 December 2024)
The court found that the applicants' employment contracts were concluded in respect of positions not included in the municipal staff establishment, as required by section 66 of the Municipal Systems Act. As a result, the contracts were null and void and the applicants were not lawfully employed. The arbitrator's award, which found that the applicants had not proven dismissal and that their contracts were unlawful, constituted a jurisdictional ruling and was correct. Even if the award was not a jurisdictional ruling, the outcome was reasonable based on the evidence. The applicants failed to provide proof that their positions were authorised or budgeted for, and the evidence supported the...
- Citation
- [2024] ZALCJHB 543
- Parties
- Applicant: Milton Marweshe and Others; Respondent: City of Tshwane Metropolitan Municipality; Respondent: SA Local Government Bargaining Council; Respondent: Elsabe Maree NO
- Court
- Labour Court Johannesburg
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 9 December 2024
- Case Number
- JR82/2024
- Procedural Posture
- Review Application / Judgment on Review of Arbitration Award
- Outcome
- Review application dismissed; no order as to costs.
- Judges
- Daniels
- Legal Topics
- Municipal Staff Establishment, Unlawful Employment Contract, Jurisdictional Ruling, Review of Arbitration Award, Irregular Expenditure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Milton Marweshe and Others
Applicant
City of Tshwane Metropolitan Municipality
Respondent
SA Local Government Bargaining Council
Respondent
Elsabe Maree NO
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Review Application / Judgment on Review of Arbitration Award
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicants' employment contracts with the City were valid and lawful.
- 2 Whether the arbitrator's finding that the applicants were not dismissed was reasonable.
- 3 Whether the applicants' positions were included in the municipal staff establishment as required by law.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicants' employment contracts were concluded in respect of positions not included in the municipal staff establishment, as required by section 66 of the Municipal Systems Act. As a result, the contracts were null and void and the applicants were not lawfully employed. The arbitrator's award, which found that the applicants had not proven dismissal and that their contracts were unlawful, constituted a jurisdictional ruling and was correct. Even if the award was not a jurisdictional ruling, the outcome was reasonable based on the evidence. The applicants failed to provide proof that their positions were authorised or budgeted for, and the evidence supported the...
Court Disposition
Review application dismissed; no order as to costs.
Orders
- The review application is dismissed.
- There is no order as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment