Mayisela v African National Congress and Others (1342/2007) [2008] ZANWHC 8 (15 May 2008)
The court held that clause 13 of the ANC Candidate Acceptance Form relates to the operational requirements of the ANC and was not intended to be used as a substitute for properly instituted disciplinary proceedings. The proceedings against the applicant by the Provincial Working Committee constituted disciplinary...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2008] ZANWHC 8
- Parties
- Applicant: Elliot Mandlenkosi Mayisela; Respondent: African National Congress; Respondent: North West Provincial Legislature; Respondent: Premier North West Province; Respondent: Emily Mamayete Mampane
- Court
- North West High Court, Mafikeng
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 15 May 2008
- Case Number
- 1342/2007
- Procedural Posture
- Review Application / Final Judgment After Hearing on Amended Notice of Motion
- Outcome
- Application granted. The decision to withdraw the applicant is declared invalid and set aside. The applicant is to be reinstated as a member of the North West Provincial Legislature. Costs awarded against the first and second respondents jointly and severally.
- Judges
- L G Lever
- Legal Topics
- Internal Party Discipline, Review of Administrative Action, Natural Justice, Interpretation of Contracts, Mandamus
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Elliot Mandlenkosi Mayisela
Applicant
African National Congress
Respondent
North West Provincial Legislature
Respondent
Premier North West Province
Respondent
Emily Mamayete Mampane
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Review Application / Final Judgment After Hearing on Amended Notice of Motion
Legal Issues
- 1 How should clause 13 of the ANC Candidate Acceptance Form be interpreted in the context of party discipline and operational requirements?
- 2 Did the proceedings against the applicant constitute disciplinary action requiring compliance with Rule 25 of the ANC Constitution?
- 3 Is the relief sought by the applicant, including reinstatement and removal of the fourth respondent, competent and capable of lawful implementation?
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that clause 13 of the ANC Candidate Acceptance Form relates to the operational requirements of the ANC and was not intended to be used as a substitute for properly instituted disciplinary proceedings. The proceedings against the applicant by the Provincial Working Committee constituted disciplinary action, and the committee lacked the power to conduct such proceedings or impose sanctions. The decision to remove the applicant was therefore inconsistent with Rule 25 of the ANC Constitution and invalid. The second respondent's legal question was dismissed as misconceived, since the acts of removal and swearing-in were not challenged for irregularity or unlawfulness, and the...
Court Disposition
Application granted. The decision to withdraw the applicant is declared invalid and set aside. The applicant is to be reinstated as a member of the North West Provincial Legislature. Costs awarded against the first and second respondents jointly and severally.
Orders
- The decision of the first respondent taken on 6 July 2007 to withdraw the applicant as a representative in the North West Provincial Legislature is declared invalid and of no force and effect.
- The decision of the first respondent taken on 6 July 2007 to withdraw the applicant is reviewed and set aside.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment