Mbana and Others v Mngomezulu (C 76/2021) [2021] ZALCCT 2; (2021) 42 ILJ 1217 (LC) (24 February 2021)

Mbana and Others v Mngomezulu (C 76/2021) [2021] ZALCCT 2; (2021) 42 ILJ 1217 (LC) (24 February 2021)

The application was struck off the roll due to two fundamental defects: lack of urgency and non-joinder of the union (FAWU) as a respondent. The court found that the applicants failed to provide sufficient factual detail to justify urgency, as the alleged prejudicial events were not recent and lacked specificity. The only recent event, the disciplinary action against Mbana, was not adequately substantiated with imminent prejudice. Furthermore, the relief sought directly affected the union's governance and the validity of its office bearers, making the union a necessary party to the proceedings. The failure to join the union as a respondent was fatal, as the union has a direct and...

Citation
[2021] ZALCCT 2
Parties
Applicant: Mhleli Osbourne Mbana; Applicant: Members of FAWU; Applicant: FAWU Officials (as listed in the attached list); Respondent: Mngomezulu Mayoyo
Court
Labour Court Cape Town
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
24 February 2021
Case Number
C 76/2021
Procedural Posture
Urgent Application / Application Struck Off Roll for Lack of Urgency and Non Joinder
Outcome
Application struck off the roll for lack of urgency and non-joinder of FAWU as a respondent.
Judges
Lagrange
Legal Topics
Joinder, Urgency, Locus Standi, Union Governance
Labour Law Civil Procedure Joinder Urgency Locus Standi Union Governance

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mhleli Osbourne Mbana

Applicant

Members of FAWU

Applicant

FAWU Officials (as listed in the attached list)

Applicant

Mngomezulu Mayoyo

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Urgent Application / Application Struck Off Roll for Lack of Urgency and Non Joinder

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the application should be entertained on an urgent basis.
  2. 2 Whether the applicants have locus standi to bring the application.
  3. 3 Whether the union (FAWU) should have been joined as a respondent.

Ratio Decidendi

The application was struck off the roll due to two fundamental defects: lack of urgency and non-joinder of the union (FAWU) as a respondent. The court found that the applicants failed to provide sufficient factual detail to justify urgency, as the alleged prejudicial events were not recent and lacked specificity. The only recent event, the disciplinary action against Mbana, was not adequately substantiated with imminent prejudice. Furthermore, the relief sought directly affected the union's governance and the validity of its office bearers, making the union a necessary party to the proceedings. The failure to join the union as a respondent was fatal, as the union has a direct and...

Court Disposition

Application struck off the roll for lack of urgency and non-joinder of FAWU as a respondent.

Orders

  • The application is struck off the roll for lack of urgency and non-joinder of FAWU as a respondent.
  • No order is made as to costs.