Mokoena and Another v MFC Division of Nedbank Limited and Others (NCT/19119/2014/138(1)(P)) [2016] ZANCT 38 (28 July 2016)
The Tribunal found that the applicants and respondents were parties to a debt re-arrangement facilitated by a debt counsellor under section 86(7)(b) read with section 138(1) of the National Credit Act. The Tribunal was satisfied that the revised payment structure complied with the Act and confirmed it as an order of the Tribunal in terms of section 150. The Tribunal emphasized the legal consequences of non-compliance, including the possibility of enforcement as a High Court order and the commission of an offence under section 160(1) of the Act. The parties were reminded of their rights to apply for a clearance certificate and the obligations of credit bureaus to expunge records upon...
- Citation
- [2016] ZANCT 38
- Parties
- Applicant: Luciano Lesego Koena Mokoena; Applicant: Nonhlanhla Eliza Mokoena; Respondent: MFC Division of Nedbank Limited; Respondent: First Rand Bank Limited; Respondent: Nedbank Limited; Respondent: First National Bank a Division of First Rand Bank Limited; Respondent: Wonga Finance SA (Pty) Limited; Respondent: African Bank Limited; Respondent: FinChoice (Pty) Limited; Respondent: HomeChoice (Pty) Limited; Respondent: Standard Bank of South Africa Limited; Respondent: Edcon (Pty) Limited; Respondent: Capfin (Pty) Limited; Respondent: Capitec Bank Limited
- Court
- National Consumer Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 28 July 2016
- Case Number
- NCT/19119/2014/138(1)(P)
- Procedural Posture
- Review Application / Application to Vary Debt Re Arrangement Order
- Outcome
- The application to vary the debt re-arrangement order was granted and the revised payment structure was confirmed as an order of the Tribunal.
- Judges
- P A Beck, H Devraj, F Sibanda
- Legal Topics
- Debt Rearrangement, National Credit Act, Consent Order, Enforcement of Tribunal Orders
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Luciano Lesego Koena Mokoena
Applicant
Nonhlanhla Eliza Mokoena
Applicant
MFC Division of Nedbank Limited
Respondent
First Rand Bank Limited
Respondent
Nedbank Limited
Respondent
First National Bank a Division of First Rand Bank Limited
Respondent
Wonga Finance SA (Pty) Limited
Respondent
African Bank Limited
Respondent
FinChoice (Pty) Limited
Respondent
HomeChoice (Pty) Limited
Respondent
Standard Bank of South Africa Limited
Respondent
Edcon (Pty) Limited
Respondent
Capfin (Pty) Limited
Respondent
Capitec Bank Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Review Application / Application to Vary Debt Re Arrangement Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the existing debt re-arrangement order should be varied in terms of the National Credit Act.
- 2 Whether the payment structure between the consumers and credit providers complies with the Act.
- 3 What are the consequences of non-compliance with the Tribunal's order.
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found that the applicants and respondents were parties to a debt re-arrangement facilitated by a debt counsellor under section 86(7)(b) read with section 138(1) of the National Credit Act. The Tribunal was satisfied that the revised payment structure complied with the Act and confirmed it as an order of the Tribunal in terms of section 150. The Tribunal emphasized the legal consequences of non-compliance, including the possibility of enforcement as a High Court order and the commission of an offence under section 160(1) of the Act. The parties were reminded of their rights to apply for a clearance certificate and the obligations of credit bureaus to expunge records upon...
Court Disposition
The application to vary the debt re-arrangement order was granted and the revised payment structure was confirmed as an order of the Tribunal.
Orders
- The payment structure between the consumers and the credit providers is confirmed as an order of the Tribunal in terms of section 150 of the National Credit Act.
- The parties are directed to comply with the revised payment arrangements as set out in the order.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment