Molosiwa v Molosiwa (153/03) [2005] ZANWHC 24 (17 March 2005)

Molosiwa v Molosiwa (153/03) [2005] ZANWHC 24 (17 March 2005)

The court found that the marriage had broken down irretrievably and that both parties were capable parents who provided for the children's needs. However, the breakdown in communication and the acrimony between the parties made joint custody inappropriate. The evidence from the Family Advocate, Family Counsellor, and Psychologist indicated that the children preferred to stay with the plaintiff and that she was a suitable custodian. The defendant's opposition to custody appeared motivated by financial concerns rather than the children's welfare. The court held that the interests of the children were paramount and awarded custody to the plaintiff, with reasonable access to the defendant....

Citation
[2005] ZANWHC 24
Parties
Plaintiff: Adelaide Deborah Molosiwa; Defendant: Dale Maruping Molosiwa
Court
North West High Court, Mafikeng
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
17 March 2005
Case Number
153/03
Procedural Posture
Divorce Application / Final Judgment
Outcome
Decree of divorce granted; custody of minor children awarded to plaintiff; defendant to have reasonable access; maintenance and division of joint estate ordered.
Judges
M M Leeuw
Legal Topics
Custody of Minors, Maintenance, Division of Joint Estate, Appointment of Liquidator
Family and Children Custody of Minors Maintenance Division of Joint Estate Appointment of Liquidator

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 12 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Adelaide Deborah Molosiwa

Plaintiff

Dale Maruping Molosiwa

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Divorce Application / Final Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether custody of the three minor children should be awarded to the plaintiff or defendant.
  2. 2 Whether joint custody is appropriate given the breakdown in communication between the parties.
  3. 3 How maintenance and financial responsibilities for the children should be allocated.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the marriage had broken down irretrievably and that both parties were capable parents who provided for the children's needs. However, the breakdown in communication and the acrimony between the parties made joint custody inappropriate. The evidence from the Family Advocate, Family Counsellor, and Psychologist indicated that the children preferred to stay with the plaintiff and that she was a suitable custodian. The defendant's opposition to custody appeared motivated by financial concerns rather than the children's welfare. The court held that the interests of the children were paramount and awarded custody to the plaintiff, with reasonable access to the defendant....

Court Disposition

Decree of divorce granted; custody of minor children awarded to plaintiff; defendant to have reasonable access; maintenance and division of joint estate ordered.

Orders

  • The decree of divorce is granted.
  • Custody of the minor children is awarded to the plaintiff.