P.S.G v L.G (030710-2024)
P.S.G v L.G (030710-2024) [2025] ZAGPPHC 184 (27 February 2025)
The applicant failed to establish any of the jurisdictional grounds required under Rule 42(1) of the Uniform Rules of Court or the common law for variation of a final court order. There was no error, ambiguity, or mistake common to the parties, and the settlement agreement accurately reflected the parties' intentions. The applicant's reliance on S.Z v L.Z was misplaced, as that judgment did not support her case. The court emphasized the importance of finality in litigation and found no exceptional circumstances warranting variation. The application was therefore dismissed as entirely without…
Source excerpt
- Variation Of Court Order
- Settlement Agreement
- Appointment Of Liquidator
- Rule 42 Uniform Rules
- Costs Punitive Scale