Motaung v Department of Higher Education and Training (JS304/24) [2025] ZALCJHB 262 (7 May 2025)
The applicant initiated review proceedings by way of action instead of the required motion proceedings. Rule 37 of the Labour Court Rules prescribes that review applications must be brought by notice of motion and supporting affidavit. As the procedure was not followed, the matter is not properly before the Court and must be struck off the roll.
- Citation
- [2025] ZALCJHB 262
- Parties
- Applicant: Hofi Paul Motaung; Respondent: Department of Higher Education & Training
- Court
- Labour Court Johannesburg
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 7 May 2025
- Case Number
- JS304/24
- Procedural Posture
- Review Application / Default Judgment Application
- Outcome
- Matter struck off the roll due to procedural non-compliance.
- Judges
- Phehane
- Legal Topics
- Review of Termination, Section 158 1 H, Procedural Irregularity, Motion Vs Action Proceedings
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Hofi Paul Motaung
Applicant
Department of Higher Education & Training
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Review Application / Default Judgment Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant's review application is properly before the Labour Court when initiated by action proceedings instead of motion proceedings.
- 2 Whether the matter should be struck off the roll due to procedural non-compliance.
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant initiated review proceedings by way of action instead of the required motion proceedings. Rule 37 of the Labour Court Rules prescribes that review applications must be brought by notice of motion and supporting affidavit. As the procedure was not followed, the matter is not properly before the Court and must be struck off the roll.
Court Disposition
Matter struck off the roll due to procedural non-compliance.
Orders
- The matter is struck off the roll.
- There is no order as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment