Mr Property Developers (Pty) Ltd v North-West Housing Corporation (2465/2010) [2011] ZANWHC 73 (8 December 2011)
The applicant failed to prove it was lawfully substituted for Ms Pheto as purchaser of the properties. The requirements for valid ratification of a pre-incorporation contract under section 35 of the Companies Act were not met, as the applicant's memorandum excluded pre-incorporation contracts, and there was no evidence of proper notification or written ratification. The contracts relied upon were not signed by two authorised signatories as required by section 22 of the North West Housing Corporation Act. The minutes produced did not comply with statutory requirements, and the applicant's case was prejudicially advanced in reply, denying the respondent an opportunity to address new...
- Citation
- [2011] ZANWHC 73
- Parties
- Applicant: MR Property Developers (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: North West Housing Corporation
- Court
- North West High Court, Mafikeng
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 8 December 2011
- Case Number
- 2465/2010
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Application / Judgment After Hearing on Merits and Interlocutory Application
- Outcome
- The main application is dismissed with costs. The applicant is ordered to pay the respondent's costs of the interlocutory application on an attorney and client scale from 16 July 2011.
- Judges
- A A Landman
- Legal Topics
- Rectification of Contract, Pre Incorporation Contract, Authority of Signatory, Costs Punitive, Auction Sale
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
MR Property Developers (Pty) Ltd
Applicant
North West Housing Corporation
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / Judgment After Hearing on Merits and Interlocutory Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant was lawfully substituted as purchaser of the properties.
- 2 Whether the cancellation, pledge and cession agreements should be rectified to reflect the applicant as a party.
- 3 Whether the Corporation was bound by agreements signed by a single signatory.
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant failed to prove it was lawfully substituted for Ms Pheto as purchaser of the properties. The requirements for valid ratification of a pre-incorporation contract under section 35 of the Companies Act were not met, as the applicant's memorandum excluded pre-incorporation contracts, and there was no evidence of proper notification or written ratification. The contracts relied upon were not signed by two authorised signatories as required by section 22 of the North West Housing Corporation Act. The minutes produced did not comply with statutory requirements, and the applicant's case was prejudicially advanced in reply, denying the respondent an opportunity to address new...
Court Disposition
The main application is dismissed with costs. The applicant is ordered to pay the respondent's costs of the interlocutory application on an attorney and client scale from 16 July 2011.
Orders
- The main application is dismissed with costs.
- The applicant is to pay the respondent's costs of the interlocutory application on an attorney and client scale but only as from 16 July 2011.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment