Balatincz v Coetzer N.O and Others (7634/2023) [2025] ZALMPPHC 132 (7 July 2025)
Court
Limpopo High Court, Polokwane
Case number
7634/2023
Judge
Mangena
The High Court held that a written sale agreement for a farm was valid and binding, rejecting the seller’s expiry-date challenge and ordering transfer.
Abedair Aviation Limited and Another v National Airways Corporation Pty Ltd (2022/027413) [2025] ZAGPJHC 643 (26 June 2025)
Court
South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
Case number
2022/027413
Judge
Aucamp
The court dismissed an application to declare or rescind a default judgment, finding jurisdiction was established and the suretyship was validly signed.
Howe v Platform 45 (Pty) Ltd (13158/2022) [2025] ZAGPJHC 409 (29 April 2025)
Court
South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
Case number
13158/2022
Judge
Minnaar
The High Court granted a partial Rule 35(7) discovery order in a contract valuation dispute, requiring production of valuation and financial documents but rejecting vague or overbroad requests.
Industrial Corporation of South Africa v MARA Corporation and Others (2023/035089) [2025] ZAGPJHC 412 (3 April 2025)
Court
South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
Case number
2023/035089
Judge
Nty Siwendu
The High Court refused defendants’ bid to amend a plea to add misrepresentation and rectification defences to a guarantee claim, finding the amendments vague and excipiable.
Optimal Outcomes (Pty) Ltd v Go Canna Africa Ltd and Another (2021/1568) [2025] ZAGPPHC 376 (2 April 2025)
Court
North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
Case number
2021/1568
Judge
Swanepoel
The plaintiff failed to prove that the second defendant made any representation, by word or conduct, that Naude was authorized to act on its behalf. All evidence of authority originated from Naude himself, not from the second defendant. The plaintiff's reliance on Naude's statements and the venue of meetings was insufficient to establish ostensible authority. Furthermore, even if some representation existed, it would not have been reasonable for the plaintiff to assume Naude was authorized to enter into a guarantee agreement outside the ordinary course of the second defendant's business. The…
Bagon Investment Holdings (Pty) Ltd v Hadar and Others (2024/059610) [2025] ZAGPPHC 302 (7 March 2025)
Court
North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
Case number
2024/059610
Judge
De Beer
The court found that the lease agreement was not validly renewed in terms of clause 5.2. The respondents' email constituted an invitation to negotiate rather than a formal exercise of the renewal option, and did not comply with the procedural requirements, including delivery to the domicilium address. The handwritten amendment to clause 5.1 did not alter the renewal period in clause 5.2, which remained one year and was not amended. The respondents failed to prosecute a counterapplication for rectification and did not provide sufficient evidence of a common intention to renew for three years.…
Caterpillar Financial Services South Africa (Pty) Ltd v MNTK Projects Proprietary Limited (1150/2024) [2025] ZALMPPHC 23 (3 February 2025)
Court
Limpopo High Court, Polokwane
Case number
1150/2024
Judge
M Bresler
The High Court granted rei vindicatio relief, rectified an instalment sale schedule, and ordered return of Caterpillar units after cancellation of the agreement.
Cellsecure Monitoring and Response (Pty) Ltd and Others v South African Securitisation Programme (RF) Limited (A201/2023; 21647/2021) [2025] ZAGPPHC 98 (31 January 2025)
Court
North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
Case number
A201/2023; 21647/2021
Judges
Oosthuizen-Senekal, Mngqibisa-Thusi, Wanless
The High Court dismissed an appeal against summary judgment and rectification, holding that the appellants failed to disclose a bona fide defence under Rule 32.