Murray & Roberts Limited and Cementation Company (Africa) Limited (02/LM/Jan04) [2004] ZACT 47; [2004] 1 CPLR 145 (CT) (28 June 2004)
The Tribunal found that, although the merger would increase concentration in the shaft sinking and raise drilling sub-markets and eliminate a significant competitor in each, the features of these markets mitigate competition concerns. The markets are characterized by large, lumpy projects awarded through competitive bidding processes to sophisticated mining clients who possess significant countervailing power. Market share data are not dispositive due to the nature of contract awards. The Tribunal was persuaded that credible new entry is possible, particularly through consortia of local and international firms, and that mining companies themselves retain the capacity to enter or...
- Citation
- [2004] ZACT 47
- Parties
- Applicant: Murray & Roberts Limited; Respondent: Cementation Company (Africa) Limited; Respondent: Competition Commission
- Court
- Competition Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 28 June 2004
- Case Number
- 02/LM/Jan04
- Procedural Posture
- Large Merger Review / Reasons for Unconditional Approval After Hearing
- Outcome
- Merger approved unconditionally; no substantial lessening or prevention of competition found.
- Judges
- David Lewis, Phatudi Maponya, Merle Holden
- Legal Topics
- Large Merger Review, Market Definition, Barriers to Entry, Countervailing Power, Predatory Pricing, Bid Rigging
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Murray & Roberts Limited
Applicant
Cementation Company (Africa) Limited
Respondent
Competition Commission
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Large Merger Review / Reasons for Unconditional Approval After Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Does the proposed merger substantially lessen or prevent competition in the relevant markets for mining infrastructure services, specifically shaft sinking and raise drilling?
- 2 Are there significant barriers to entry or credible prospects for new entry in these markets?
- 3 Do features of bidding markets and countervailing power of mining companies mitigate competition concerns?
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found that, although the merger would increase concentration in the shaft sinking and raise drilling sub-markets and eliminate a significant competitor in each, the features of these markets mitigate competition concerns. The markets are characterized by large, lumpy projects awarded through competitive bidding processes to sophisticated mining clients who possess significant countervailing power. Market share data are not dispositive due to the nature of contract awards. The Tribunal was persuaded that credible new entry is possible, particularly through consortia of local and international firms, and that mining companies themselves retain the capacity to enter or...
Court Disposition
Merger approved unconditionally; no substantial lessening or prevention of competition found.
Orders
- The large merger between Murray & Roberts Limited and Cementation Company (Africa) Limited is approved unconditionally.
- No conditions are imposed on the transaction.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment