National Credit Regulator v Chisevhe Trading Enterprise (Pty) Ltd (NCT/223352/2022/57(1)) [2022] ZANCT 45 (1 July 2022)
The Tribunal found that the respondent repeatedly contravened multiple provisions of the National Credit Act and its regulations, including failing to conduct affordability assessments, not obtaining credit bureau reports, failing to provide pre-agreement statements and quotations, charging excessive interest rates, unlawfully retaining consumer instruments, and failing to keep and submit required records and returns. These contraventions constituted prohibited conduct under section 150(a) of the Act. The respondent's credit agreements with consumers were declared reckless and set aside. The Tribunal ordered the cancellation of the respondent's registration as a credit provider, the...
- Citation
- [2022] ZANCT 45
- Parties
- Applicant: National Credit Regulator; Respondent: Chisevhe Trading Enterprise (Pty) Ltd
- Court
- National Consumer Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 1 July 2022
- Case Number
- NCT/223352/2022/57(1)
- Procedural Posture
- Review Application / Default Judgment After Respondent Failed to File Answering Affidavit or Attend Hearing.
- Outcome
- Application granted. Respondent's registration as a credit provider cancelled. Credit agreements declared reckless and set aside. Administrative fine imposed. Auditor to be appointed for consumer refunds.
- Judges
- T Bailey, A Potwana, M Peenze
- Legal Topics
- Reckless Lending, Affordability Assessment, Credit Provider Registration, Administrative Fine, Prohibited Conduct, Record Keeping Requirements
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
National Credit Regulator
Applicant
Chisevhe Trading Enterprise (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Review Application / Default Judgment After Respondent Failed to File Answering Affidavit or Attend Hearing.
Legal Issues
- 1 Did the respondent contravene the National Credit Act and its regulations in the granting of credit?
- 2 Was the respondent's conduct prohibited under section 150(a) of the Act?
- 3 Should the respondent's registration as a credit provider be cancelled?
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found that the respondent repeatedly contravened multiple provisions of the National Credit Act and its regulations, including failing to conduct affordability assessments, not obtaining credit bureau reports, failing to provide pre-agreement statements and quotations, charging excessive interest rates, unlawfully retaining consumer instruments, and failing to keep and submit required records and returns. These contraventions constituted prohibited conduct under section 150(a) of the Act. The respondent's credit agreements with consumers were declared reckless and set aside. The Tribunal ordered the cancellation of the respondent's registration as a credit provider, the...
Court Disposition
Application granted. Respondent's registration as a credit provider cancelled. Credit agreements declared reckless and set aside. Administrative fine imposed. Auditor to be appointed for consumer refunds.
Orders
- The respondent's registration as a credit provider is cancelled immediately.
- The respondent's credit agreements with consumers in annexures D1 to D10 of the investigation report are declared reckless and set aside.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment