National Credit Regulator v Du Plessis t/a Eagle Cash Loans (NCT/40817/2016/57(1)) [2017] ZANCT 44 (1 February 2017)
The Tribunal found that the Respondent, a registered credit provider, repeatedly contravened the National Credit Act and its Regulations by failing to conduct proper affordability assessments, granting reckless credit, failing to provide required documentation, charging excessive interest, and unlawfully retaining and using consumer SASSA cards for debt collection. The Respondent failed to oppose the application or provide any defence, and the allegations were deemed admitted. The evidence established gross violations of consumer rights and disregard for statutory obligations. The Tribunal concluded that the Respondent's registration must be cancelled and an administrative fine imposed to...
- Citation
- [2017] ZANCT 44
- Parties
- Applicant: National Credit Regulator; Respondent: Burgert Wynand du Plessis t/a Eagle Cash Loans
- Court
- National Consumer Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 1 February 2017
- Case Number
- NCT/40817/2016/57(1)
- Procedural Posture
- Cancellation Application / Default Judgment After Respondent Failed to File Answering Affidavit and Condonation Application Lapsed.
- Outcome
- Application granted. Respondent's registration as a credit provider cancelled and administrative fine imposed.
- Judges
- John Simpson, Penny Beck-Paxton, Fati Manamela
- Legal Topics
- National Credit Act, Reckless Lending, Affordability Assessment, Excessive Interest, Prohibited Conduct, Administrative Fine
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
National Credit Regulator
Applicant
Burgert Wynand du Plessis t/a Eagle Cash Loans
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Cancellation Application / Default Judgment After Respondent Failed to File Answering Affidavit and Condonation Application Lapsed.
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Respondent contravened the National Credit Act, its Regulations, and Conditions of Registration.
- 2 Whether the Respondent's registration as a credit provider should be cancelled due to repeated contraventions.
- 3 Whether the Respondent's conduct warrants the imposition of an administrative fine.
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found that the Respondent, a registered credit provider, repeatedly contravened the National Credit Act and its Regulations by failing to conduct proper affordability assessments, granting reckless credit, failing to provide required documentation, charging excessive interest, and unlawfully retaining and using consumer SASSA cards for debt collection. The Respondent failed to oppose the application or provide any defence, and the allegations were deemed admitted. The evidence established gross violations of consumer rights and disregard for statutory obligations. The Tribunal concluded that the Respondent's registration must be cancelled and an administrative fine imposed to...
Court Disposition
Application granted. Respondent's registration as a credit provider cancelled and administrative fine imposed.
Orders
- The Respondent's contravention of the Act is declared prohibited conduct.
- The registration of the Respondent as a credit provider is cancelled with immediate effect in terms of section 57(1).
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment