National Credit Regulator v Microloans Two Go (Pty) t/a Microloans 2 Go (NCT/158471/2020/57(1)) [2021] ZANCT 4 (15 April 2021)
The Tribunal found, on a balance of probabilities, that the Respondent repeatedly contravened the National Credit Act by failing to conduct proper affordability assessments, charging interest in excess of prescribed limits, and failing to use the prescribed forms for small credit agreements. The evidence showed that credit bureau reports were accessed after loans were granted and that interest was calculated incorrectly, resulting in consumer overcharges. The Respondent's conduct constituted prohibited conduct under the NCA. Despite voluntary deregistration, the Tribunal held that remedial orders and an administrative fine were appropriate to deter similar conduct and protect consumer...
- Citation
- [2021] ZANCT 4
- Parties
- Applicant: National Credit Regulator; Respondent: Microloans Two Go (Pty) Ltd t/a Microloans 2 Go
- Court
- National Consumer Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 15 April 2021
- Case Number
- NCT/158471/2020/57(1)
- Procedural Posture
- Administrative Application / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- The Tribunal found the Respondent guilty of repeated contraventions of the National Credit Act and imposed remedial orders and an administrative fine.
- Judges
- T Woker, B Dumisa, M Peenze
- Legal Topics
- National Credit Act, Reckless Lending, Affordability Assessment, Excessive Interest, Prescribed Forms, Administrative Fine
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
National Credit Regulator
Applicant
Microloans Two Go (Pty) Ltd t/a Microloans 2 Go
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Administrative Application / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Did the Respondent repeatedly contravene the National Credit Act and associated regulations by engaging in reckless credit lending, charging excessive interest, and failing to use prescribed forms for small credit agreements?
- 2 Is the Respondent liable for administrative penalties and consumer refunds under the NCA despite voluntary deregistration?
- 3 Should the Tribunal set aside consumer obligations under the impugned credit agreements and order further remedial measures?
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found, on a balance of probabilities, that the Respondent repeatedly contravened the National Credit Act by failing to conduct proper affordability assessments, charging interest in excess of prescribed limits, and failing to use the prescribed forms for small credit agreements. The evidence showed that credit bureau reports were accessed after loans were granted and that interest was calculated incorrectly, resulting in consumer overcharges. The Respondent's conduct constituted prohibited conduct under the NCA. Despite voluntary deregistration, the Tribunal held that remedial orders and an administrative fine were appropriate to deter similar conduct and protect consumer...
Court Disposition
The Tribunal found the Respondent guilty of repeated contraventions of the National Credit Act and imposed remedial orders and an administrative fine.
Orders
- The Respondent is found guilty of repeatedly contravening specified provisions of the National Credit Act.
- The credit agreements entered into between the Respondent and the listed consumers are declared reckless.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment