National Credit Regulator v Murphy and Sons Cash Loans CC (NCT/82548/2017/57(1)) [2018] ZANCT 14 (23 February 2018)
The Tribunal found that the Respondent repeatedly contravened the National Credit Act and the conditions of its registration as a credit provider. The Respondent failed to conduct proper affordability assessments, entered into reckless credit agreements, failed to keep proper records, did not provide required pre-agreement statements and quotations, and charged excessive interest and fees. The Respondent did not oppose the application and failed to appear at the hearing, resulting in the Applicant's allegations being deemed admitted. The Tribunal concluded that these contraventions amounted to prohibited conduct under section 150(a) of the NCA. Given the seriousness, duration, and gravity...
- Citation
- [2018] ZANCT 14
- Parties
- Applicant: National Credit Regulator; Respondent: Murphy and Sons Cash Loans CC
- Court
- National Consumer Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 23 February 2018
- Case Number
- NCT/82548/2017/57(1)
- Procedural Posture
- Review Application / Default Judgment Following Non Appearance and Failure to Oppose
- Outcome
- Application granted. Respondent found to have repeatedly contravened the National Credit Act and its registration conditions. Registration cancelled. Administrative fine imposed. Refunds to consumers ordered.
- Judges
- FK Manamela, J Simpson, M Nkomo
- Legal Topics
- National Credit Act, Reckless Lending, Administrative Fine, Registration Cancellation, Consumer Refund
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
National Credit Regulator
Applicant
Murphy and Sons Cash Loans CC
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Review Application / Default Judgment Following Non Appearance and Failure to Oppose
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the registration of the Respondent as a credit provider should be cancelled under section 57(1) of the National Credit Act.
- 2 Whether the Respondent contravened sections 81(2)(a), 81(3) read with 80(1)(a), 170 read with Regulation 55(1)(b)(vi), 92(1) read with Regulation 28(1)(b), 100(1)(c) read with Regulation 42, and 101(1)(d) read with 105(1)(a) of the NCA.
- 3 Whether the Respondent's conduct amounts to prohibited conduct under section 150(a) of the NCA.
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found that the Respondent repeatedly contravened the National Credit Act and the conditions of its registration as a credit provider. The Respondent failed to conduct proper affordability assessments, entered into reckless credit agreements, failed to keep proper records, did not provide required pre-agreement statements and quotations, and charged excessive interest and fees. The Respondent did not oppose the application and failed to appear at the hearing, resulting in the Applicant's allegations being deemed admitted. The Tribunal concluded that these contraventions amounted to prohibited conduct under section 150(a) of the NCA. Given the seriousness, duration, and gravity...
Court Disposition
Application granted. Respondent found to have repeatedly contravened the National Credit Act and its registration conditions. Registration cancelled. Administrative fine imposed. Refunds to consumers ordered.
Orders
- The conduct of the Respondent is declared prohibited under the National Credit Act.
- The registration of the Respondent as a credit provider is cancelled with immediate effect.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment