National Credit Regulator v Ncedumzantsi Business Solutions CC (NCT/223374/2022/57(1)) [2024] ZANCT 34 (10 September 2024)
The Tribunal found that the respondent repeatedly contravened multiple provisions of the National Credit Act and its regulations by failing to conduct proper affordability assessments, engaging in reckless credit granting, charging unlawful and excessive fees, failing to keep proper records, and not submitting statutory reports. The respondent did not contest the allegations, and all facts were deemed admitted. The contraventions were serious and systemic, justifying the declaration of prohibited conduct, setting aside of consumers' obligations under the affected credit agreements, refund of costs to consumers, appointment of an independent auditor to investigate further contraventions,...
- Citation
- [2024] ZANCT 34
- Parties
- Applicant: National Credit Regulator; Respondent: Ncedumzantsi Business Solutions CC
- Court
- National Consumer Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 10 September 2024
- Case Number
- NCT/223374/2022/57(1)
- Procedural Posture
- Default Application / Judgment After Respondent Failed to File Answering Affidavit; Matter Heard on a Default Basis.
- Outcome
- Application granted. Respondent's registration as a credit provider cancelled. Credit agreements declared reckless and set aside. Refunds and further investigation ordered. No administrative fine imposed.
- Judges
- Z Ntuli, MC Peenze, S Mbhele
- Legal Topics
- National Credit Act, Reckless Lending, Affordability Assessment, Prohibited Conduct, Administrative Fine, Credit Provider Registration
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
National Credit Regulator
Applicant
Ncedumzantsi Business Solutions CC
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Default Application / Judgment After Respondent Failed to File Answering Affidavit; Matter Heard on a Default Basis.
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondent repeatedly contravened the National Credit Act and its regulations.
- 2 Whether the respondent engaged in reckless credit granting and failed to conduct proper affordability assessments.
- 3 Whether the respondent charged unlawful and excessive credit costs.
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found that the respondent repeatedly contravened multiple provisions of the National Credit Act and its regulations by failing to conduct proper affordability assessments, engaging in reckless credit granting, charging unlawful and excessive fees, failing to keep proper records, and not submitting statutory reports. The respondent did not contest the allegations, and all facts were deemed admitted. The contraventions were serious and systemic, justifying the declaration of prohibited conduct, setting aside of consumers' obligations under the affected credit agreements, refund of costs to consumers, appointment of an independent auditor to investigate further contraventions,...
Court Disposition
Application granted. Respondent's registration as a credit provider cancelled. Credit agreements declared reckless and set aside. Refunds and further investigation ordered. No administrative fine imposed.
Orders
- It is declared that the respondent repeatedly contravened sections 81(2)(a)(ii) and (iii) read with regulation 23A; section 81(3) read with section 80(1)(a); section 170 read with regulation 55(1)(b)(vi) and section 52(5)(e); section 100(1)(a) read with section 101(1); section 100(1)(b) and (c) and section...
- The above contraventions are declared prohibited conduct in terms of section 150(a).
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment