National Credit Regulator v Nonies Legacy (Pty) Ltd t/a Nonies Legacy Cash Loans (NCT-384962-2025-57(1)) [2025] ZANCT 38 (23 June 2025)
The Tribunal found that the respondent repeatedly contravened multiple provisions of the National Credit Act and associated regulations. The respondent failed to conduct proper affordability assessments, did not provide consumers with prescribed pre-agreement statements and credit agreements, and charged interest rates far in excess of statutory limits. The respondent also failed to comply with registration conditions and statutory reporting obligations. All allegations were deemed admitted due to the respondent's failure to oppose. The Tribunal held that these contraventions constituted prohibited conduct and reckless lending. Given the seriousness and repeated nature of the breaches,...
- Citation
- [2025] ZANCT 38
- Parties
- Applicant: National Credit Regulator; Respondent: Nonies Legacy (Pty) Ltd t/a Nonies Legacy Cash Loans
- Court
- National Consumer Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 23 June 2025
- Case Number
- NCT-384962-2025-57(1)
- Procedural Posture
- Review Application / Default Judgment After Unopposed Hearing
- Outcome
- Application granted. Respondent's registration cancelled. Prohibited conduct declared. Administrative fine imposed. Auditor to be appointed for consumer redress.
- Judges
- MC Peenze, CJ Ntsoane, ZP Ntuli
- Legal Topics
- National Credit Act, Reckless Lending, Affordability Assessment, Administrative Fine, Credit Provider Registration, Consumer Protection
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
National Credit Regulator
Applicant
Nonies Legacy (Pty) Ltd t/a Nonies Legacy Cash Loans
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Review Application / Default Judgment After Unopposed Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondent contravened the National Credit Act and associated regulations.
- 2 Whether the respondent engaged in reckless lending and failed to conduct proper affordability assessments.
- 3 Whether the respondent failed to provide consumers with prescribed pre-agreement statements and credit agreements.
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found that the respondent repeatedly contravened multiple provisions of the National Credit Act and associated regulations. The respondent failed to conduct proper affordability assessments, did not provide consumers with prescribed pre-agreement statements and credit agreements, and charged interest rates far in excess of statutory limits. The respondent also failed to comply with registration conditions and statutory reporting obligations. All allegations were deemed admitted due to the respondent's failure to oppose. The Tribunal held that these contraventions constituted prohibited conduct and reckless lending. Given the seriousness and repeated nature of the breaches,...
Court Disposition
Application granted. Respondent's registration cancelled. Prohibited conduct declared. Administrative fine imposed. Auditor to be appointed for consumer redress.
Orders
- It is declared that the respondent contravened specified sections and regulations of the National Credit Act and associated regulations.
- The contraventions are declared prohibited conduct.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment