National Credit Regulator v Orange Cash Loans (Pty) Ltd (NCT/134241/2019/57(1)) [2019] ZANCT 166 (7 November 2019)
The Tribunal found that the Respondent repeatedly contravened the National Credit Act and its registration conditions by failing to conduct proper affordability assessments, extending reckless credit, charging unlawful and excessive fees, and failing to keep proper records. The Respondent did not contest the allegations, and in terms of Rule 13(5), the facts were deemed admitted. The Tribunal held that cancellation of the Respondent's registration was justified, that an independent auditor should be appointed to identify and facilitate refunds to affected consumers, and that an administrative fine was warranted due to the Respondent's significant benefit from its unlawful conduct.
- Citation
- [2019] ZANCT 166
- Parties
- Applicant: National Credit Regulator; Respondent: Orange Cash Loans (Pty) Ltd
- Court
- National Consumer Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 7 November 2019
- Case Number
- NCT/134241/2019/57(1)
- Procedural Posture
- Review Application / Default Judgment After Respondent Failed to File Answering Affidavit or Appear at Hearing
- Outcome
- Application granted. Respondent's registration as a credit provider cancelled. Auditor to be appointed to identify and facilitate refunds to affected consumers. Administrative fine imposed.
- Judges
- B Dumisa, T Woker, L Best
- Legal Topics
- National Credit Act, Reckless Lending, Affordability Assessment, Administrative Fine, Registration Cancellation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
National Credit Regulator
Applicant
Orange Cash Loans (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Review Application / Default Judgment After Respondent Failed to File Answering Affidavit or Appear at Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Did the Respondent breach the provisions of the National Credit Act and its registration conditions as alleged.
- 2 What is the appropriate sanction for the Respondent's repeated contraventions.
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found that the Respondent repeatedly contravened the National Credit Act and its registration conditions by failing to conduct proper affordability assessments, extending reckless credit, charging unlawful and excessive fees, and failing to keep proper records. The Respondent did not contest the allegations, and in terms of Rule 13(5), the facts were deemed admitted. The Tribunal held that cancellation of the Respondent's registration was justified, that an independent auditor should be appointed to identify and facilitate refunds to affected consumers, and that an administrative fine was warranted due to the Respondent's significant benefit from its unlawful conduct.
Court Disposition
Application granted. Respondent's registration as a credit provider cancelled. Auditor to be appointed to identify and facilitate refunds to affected consumers. Administrative fine imposed.
Orders
- The Respondent's registration as a credit provider is cancelled with immediate effect.
- The Respondent is ordered to appoint an independent auditor, at its own cost, to identify and facilitate refunds to consumers who were overcharged.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment