National Credit Regulator v RCL Micro Finance (Pty) Ltd (NCT/132260/2019/57(1)) [2020] ZANCT 6 (3 April 2020)
The Tribunal found that the respondent repeatedly contravened the National Credit Act and associated regulations by retaining and using SASSA cards to enforce credit agreements, failing to conduct proper affordability assessments, entering into reckless credit agreements, overcharging service fees, and requiring consumers to sign unlawful supplementary agreements. The respondent's explanations, including attributing failures to a single employee, did not absolve it of responsibility. The Tribunal refused to cancel the respondent's registration as a credit provider, considering the contraventions were limited to one branch and corrective measures were taken. However, the Tribunal imposed...
- Citation
- [2020] ZANCT 6
- Parties
- Applicant: National Credit Regulator; Respondent: RCL Micro Finance (Pty) Ltd
- Court
- National Consumer Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 3 April 2020
- Case Number
- NCT/132260/2019/57(1)
- Procedural Posture
- Review Application / Judgment and Reasons
- Outcome
- The Tribunal found repeated contraventions of the National Credit Act and regulations by the respondent, refused cancellation of registration, imposed an administrative fine, ordered appointment of an auditor, set aside obligations under reckless agreements, and made further orders as detailed.
- Judges
- T Bailey, M Peenze, J Simpson
- Legal Topics
- National Credit Act, Reckless Lending, Prohibited Conduct, Affordability Assessment, Service Fee Overcharge, Credit Provider Registration
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
National Credit Regulator
Applicant
RCL Micro Finance (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Review Application / Judgment and Reasons
Legal Issues
- 1 Did the respondent contravene the National Credit Act and associated regulations in its credit provision practices?
- 2 Did the respondent engage in prohibited conduct by retaining SASSA cards and failing to conduct proper affordability assessments?
- 3 Were the respondent's credit agreements with consumers reckless under section 80(1)(a) of the Act?
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found that the respondent repeatedly contravened the National Credit Act and associated regulations by retaining and using SASSA cards to enforce credit agreements, failing to conduct proper affordability assessments, entering into reckless credit agreements, overcharging service fees, and requiring consumers to sign unlawful supplementary agreements. The respondent's explanations, including attributing failures to a single employee, did not absolve it of responsibility. The Tribunal refused to cancel the respondent's registration as a credit provider, considering the contraventions were limited to one branch and corrective measures were taken. However, the Tribunal imposed...
Court Disposition
The Tribunal found repeated contraventions of the National Credit Act and regulations by the respondent, refused cancellation of registration, imposed an administrative fine, ordered appointment of an auditor, set aside obligations under reckless agreements, and made further orders as detailed.
Orders
- The respondent has repeatedly contravened specified sections of the Act, regulations, and conditions.
- The repeated contraventions constitute prohibited conduct under section 150(a) of the Act.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment