National Credit Regulator v Xue Cheng (Pty) Ltd Trading as Golden Sun Cash Loans (NCT/266895/2023/140(1)) [2025] ZANCT 17 (29 April 2025)
The Tribunal found that the respondent admitted to contraventions of the National Credit Act, including reckless lending and charging excessive fees, and accepted liability in the settlement agreement. The Tribunal held that the application for a consent order was competent and that the settlement agreement brought finality to the dispute. Accordingly, the Tribunal confirmed the settlement agreement as a consent order under section 138 of the NCA, making its terms enforceable. No order as to costs was made.
- Citation
- [2025] ZANCT 17
- Parties
- Applicant: National Credit Regulator; Respondent: Xue Cheng (Pty) Ltd Trading as Golden Sun Cash Loans
- Court
- National Consumer Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 29 April 2025
- Case Number
- NCT/266895/2023/140(1)
- Procedural Posture
- Consent Order Application / Consent Order Application Following Opposed Referral
- Outcome
- Settlement agreement confirmed as a consent order. No order as to costs.
- Judges
- A Potwana
- Legal Topics
- National Credit Act, Reckless Lending, Prohibited Conduct, Administrative Fine, Settlement Agreement
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
National Credit Regulator
Applicant
Xue Cheng (Pty) Ltd Trading as Golden Sun Cash Loans
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Consent Order Application / Consent Order Application Following Opposed Referral
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondent contravened specified sections and regulations of the National Credit Act.
- 2 Whether the settlement agreement between the parties should be confirmed as a consent order under section 138 of the NCA.
- 3 Whether the respondent's conduct constitutes prohibited conduct under the NCA.
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found that the respondent admitted to contraventions of the National Credit Act, including reckless lending and charging excessive fees, and accepted liability in the settlement agreement. The Tribunal held that the application for a consent order was competent and that the settlement agreement brought finality to the dispute. Accordingly, the Tribunal confirmed the settlement agreement as a consent order under section 138 of the NCA, making its terms enforceable. No order as to costs was made.
Court Disposition
Settlement agreement confirmed as a consent order. No order as to costs.
Orders
- The settlement agreement between the applicant and the respondent is confirmed as an order of the Tribunal.
- No order is made as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment