Nowalaza and Others v Office of the Chief Justice and Another (J1177/2017) [2017] ZALCJHB 234 (15 June 2017)
The Court found that the applicants established a reasonable expectation of permanent employment based on the repeated renewal of fixed term contracts and the conduct of the Office of the Chief Justice. The Public Service Act and its regulations do not override the protection afforded by section 186(1)(b)(ii) of the Labour Relations Act, as section 210 of the LRA provides that the Act prevails in case of conflict. The applicants did not waive their rights by entering into short-term contracts, as these were concluded under duress to address the employer's operational needs. The Labour Court has jurisdiction to grant declaratory and interdictory relief to prevent an unfair dismissal before...
- Citation
- [2017] ZALCJHB 234
- Parties
- Applicant: Luvuyo Nowalaza; Applicant: Individuals listed in Annexure "A"; Respondent: Office of the Chief Justice; Respondent: Memme Sejosengwe N.O.
- Court
- Labour Court Johannesburg
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 15 June 2017
- Case Number
- J1177/2017
- Procedural Posture
- Urgent Application / Final Determination of Urgent Application for Declaratory and Interdictory Relief
- Outcome
- Application granted. The applicants are declared permanent employees and the respondents are interdicted from proceeding with recruitment for their positions.
- Judges
- Coetzee
- Legal Topics
- Reasonable Expectation of Permanent Employment, Fixed Term Contracts, Public Service Act Application, Section 186 Lra, Interdictory Relief, Jurisdiction of Labour Court
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Luvuyo Nowalaza
Applicant
Individuals listed in Annexure "A"
Applicant
Office of the Chief Justice
Respondent
Memme Sejosengwe N.O.
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Urgent Application / Final Determination of Urgent Application for Declaratory and Interdictory Relief
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicants have a reasonable expectation of permanent employment under section 186(1)(b)(ii) of the Labour Relations Act.
- 2 Whether the Public Service Act and its regulations preclude a reasonable expectation of permanent employment without following the prescribed recruitment process.
- 3 Whether the Labour Court has jurisdiction to grant declaratory and interdictory relief prior to the expiry of the applicants' fixed term contracts.
Ratio Decidendi
The Court found that the applicants established a reasonable expectation of permanent employment based on the repeated renewal of fixed term contracts and the conduct of the Office of the Chief Justice. The Public Service Act and its regulations do not override the protection afforded by section 186(1)(b)(ii) of the Labour Relations Act, as section 210 of the LRA provides that the Act prevails in case of conflict. The applicants did not waive their rights by entering into short-term contracts, as these were concluded under duress to address the employer's operational needs. The Labour Court has jurisdiction to grant declaratory and interdictory relief to prevent an unfair dismissal before...
Court Disposition
Application granted. The applicants are declared permanent employees and the respondents are interdicted from proceeding with recruitment for their positions.
Orders
- The forms and service provided for in the Labour Court Rules are dispensed with and the matter is treated as one of urgency in terms of Rule 8.
- The applicants are declared permanent employees on the same terms and conditions of employment as were agreed between the applicants and the first respondent in the three month fixed term contracts of employment between the parties for the period 1 April 2017 to 30 June 2017.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment