Numsa and Others v Gabriel (Pty) Ltd (C523/2001) [2002] ZALC 74; (2002) 23 ILJ 2088 (LC); [2002] 12 BLLR 1210 (LC) (2 September 2002)

Numsa and Others v Gabriel (Pty) Ltd (C523/2001) [2002] ZALC 74; (2002) 23 ILJ 2088 (LC); [2002] 12 BLLR 1210 (LC) (2 September 2002)

The applicants failed to disclose a cause of action for unfair discrimination under section 6(1) of the Employment Equity Act because they did not identify any listed or analogous ground for the differential treatment, nor did they allege that the pay disparities were based on characteristics impacting human dignity. Mere allegations of arbitrary, capricious, or irrational conduct do not meet the threshold for discrimination as defined in the Act and constitutional jurisprudence. However, the jurisdictional exception raised by the respondent fails, as the dispute arose after the commencement of the EEA, and the alleged discriminatory remuneration practice is ongoing. The applicants are...

Citation
[2002] ZALC 74
Parties
Applicant: NUMSA; Applicant: Hendricks & 2 Others; Respondent: Gabriel (Pty) Ltd
Court
Labour Court
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
2 September 2002
Case Number
C523/2001
Procedural Posture
Exception Application / Determination of Exceptions to Statement of Case
Outcome
Exception regarding lack of jurisdiction is dismissed; exception for failure to disclose a cause of action is upheld; applicants granted leave to amend within one month; no order as to costs.
Judges
Waglay
Legal Topics
Employment Equity Act, Unfair Discrimination, Jurisdiction of Labour Court, Direct Discrimination, Remuneration Disparity
Labour Law Employment Equity Act Unfair Discrimination Jurisdiction of Labour Court Direct Discrimination Remuneration Disparity

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 12 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

NUMSA

Applicant

Hendricks & 2 Others

Applicant

Gabriel (Pty) Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Exception Application / Determination of Exceptions to Statement of Case

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the applicants' statement of case discloses a cause of action for direct unfair discrimination under section 6(1) of the Employment Equity Act.
  2. 2 Whether the Labour Court has jurisdiction to hear the dispute, considering the timing of the alleged acts and referral to the CCMA.

Ratio Decidendi

The applicants failed to disclose a cause of action for unfair discrimination under section 6(1) of the Employment Equity Act because they did not identify any listed or analogous ground for the differential treatment, nor did they allege that the pay disparities were based on characteristics impacting human dignity. Mere allegations of arbitrary, capricious, or irrational conduct do not meet the threshold for discrimination as defined in the Act and constitutional jurisprudence. However, the jurisdictional exception raised by the respondent fails, as the dispute arose after the commencement of the EEA, and the alleged discriminatory remuneration practice is ongoing. The applicants are...

Court Disposition

Exception regarding lack of jurisdiction is dismissed; exception for failure to disclose a cause of action is upheld; applicants granted leave to amend within one month; no order as to costs.

Orders

  • The exception in respect of the Court lacking jurisdiction to entertain the applicants' claim is dismissed.
  • The exception that the applicants have failed to make sufficient allegations to disclose a cause of action in terms of section 6(1) of the EEA is upheld.