P T v B T (641/2017) [2019] ZAFSHC 239 (5 December 2019)

P T v B T (641/2017) [2019] ZAFSHC 239 (5 December 2019)

The court found that the children have been living with the plaintiff and his parents for several years, are settled, and have expressed a clear wish to remain in their current environment. The Family Advocate reports, supported by school and therapist evidence, confirm that the children are thriving and that a change of residence would not be in their best interests. The defendant has not actively participated in the children's lives nor contributed financially to their maintenance. The court held that the best interests of the children require that their primary residence remain with the plaintiff, with the defendant awarded contact rights. Regarding forfeiture, the court found that the...

Citation
[2019] ZAFSHC 239
Parties
Plaintiff: P T; Defendant: B T
Court
Free State High Court, Bloemfontein
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
5 December 2019
Case Number
641/2017
Procedural Posture
Divorce Action / Final Judgment
Outcome
The marriage is dissolved; the plaintiff forfeits his share of the defendant's pension interest; parental responsibilities and rights are awarded to both parties, with primary residence to the plaintiff and contact rights to the defendant; maintenance is ordered; each party to pay its own costs.
Judges
Murray
Legal Topics
Primary Residence of Minor Children, Maintenance Obligation, Pension Interest Forfeiture, Best Interests of Child, Parental Responsibilities and Rights
Family and Children Primary Residence of Minor Children Maintenance Obligation Pension Interest Forfeiture Best Interests of Child Parental Responsibilities and Rights

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 6 Authorities cited 13 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

P T

Plaintiff

B T

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Divorce Action / Final Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the primary residence of the minor children should be awarded to the plaintiff or the defendant.
  2. 2 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to share in the defendant's pension interest upon dissolution of the marriage.
  3. 3 What maintenance obligations arise for the non-custodian parent.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the children have been living with the plaintiff and his parents for several years, are settled, and have expressed a clear wish to remain in their current environment. The Family Advocate reports, supported by school and therapist evidence, confirm that the children are thriving and that a change of residence would not be in their best interests. The defendant has not actively participated in the children's lives nor contributed financially to their maintenance. The court held that the best interests of the children require that their primary residence remain with the plaintiff, with the defendant awarded contact rights. Regarding forfeiture, the court found that the...

Court Disposition

The marriage is dissolved; the plaintiff forfeits his share of the defendant's pension interest; parental responsibilities and rights are awarded to both parties, with primary residence to the plaintiff and contact rights to the defendant; maintenance is ordered; each party to pay its own costs.

Orders

  • The marriage between the parties is dissolved.
  • The plaintiff shall forfeit his share of the defendant’s pension interest.