P T v B T (641/2017)
P T v B T (641/2017) [2019] ZAFSHC 239 (5 December 2019)
The court found that the children have been living with the plaintiff and his parents for several years, are settled, and have expressed a clear wish to remain in their current environment. The Family Advocate reports, supported by school and therapist evidence, confirm that the children are thriving and that a change of residence would not be in their best interests. The defendant has not actively participated in the children's lives nor contributed financially to their maintenance. The court held that the best interests of the children require that their primary residence remain with the pl…
Source excerpt
- Primary Residence Of Minor Children
- Maintenance Obligation
- Pension Interest Forfeiture
- Best Interests Of Child
- Parental Responsibilities And Rights