Paredes-Tarazona v Worley Parsons South Africa (Pty) Ltd (23347/2014) [2025] ZAGPJHC 753 (4 August 2025)
The court found that the plaintiff remained employed by TWP Projects (Pty) Ltd throughout and that his contracts with Peruvian entities did not alter this fact. The transfer of business as a going concern was to Worley Parsons RSA (Pty) Ltd, not the defendant, which had been dormant since 2011 and deregistered in 2017. The plaintiff failed to join the correct entity despite knowing of its existence and the defendant's dormant status. The court held that there was no contract between the plaintiff and the defendant and that estoppel could not assist the plaintiff, who knew or ought to have known the true state of affairs. Consequently, the plaintiff's claim was dismissed.
- Citation
- [2025] ZAGPJHC 753
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Hector Paredes-Tarazona; Defendant: Worley Parsons South Africa (Pty) Ltd
- Court
- South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 4 August 2025
- Case Number
- 23347/2014
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Trial / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Plaintiff's action dismissed with costs.
- Judges
- C Georgiades
- Legal Topics
- Section 197 Transfer, Employment Contract, Joinder of Parties, Retrenchment, Estoppel
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Hector Paredes-Tarazona
Plaintiff
Worley Parsons South Africa (Pty) Ltd
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Trial / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the plaintiff established a contractual nexus between himself and the defendant, Worley Parsons South Africa (Pty) Ltd.
- 2 Whether the plaintiff's employment contract was transferred to the defendant under section 197 of the Labour Relations Act.
- 3 Whether the plaintiff sued the correct party and the effect of not joining Worley Parsons RSA (Pty) Ltd.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the plaintiff remained employed by TWP Projects (Pty) Ltd throughout and that his contracts with Peruvian entities did not alter this fact. The transfer of business as a going concern was to Worley Parsons RSA (Pty) Ltd, not the defendant, which had been dormant since 2011 and deregistered in 2017. The plaintiff failed to join the correct entity despite knowing of its existence and the defendant's dormant status. The court held that there was no contract between the plaintiff and the defendant and that estoppel could not assist the plaintiff, who knew or ought to have known the true state of affairs. Consequently, the plaintiff's claim was dismissed.
Court Disposition
Plaintiff's action dismissed with costs.
Orders
- The plaintiff's action is dismissed.
- The plaintiff is ordered to pay the defendant's costs on scale A.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment