Molefe v National Youth Development Agency (NYDA) and Others (2025/084031) [2025] ZALCJHB 248 (24 June 2025)
Court
Labour Court Johannesburg
Case number
2025/084031
Judge
Daniels
The Labour Court dismissed an urgent bid to interdict the NYDA from filling a post after an offer of employment was withdrawn, finding no prima facie right or balance of convenience.
Lynnwood Hair and Beauty t/a Skin PhD Lynnwood Bridge v Maseko (069613/2025) [2025] ZAGPPHC 699 (24 June 2025)
Court
North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
Case number
069613/2025
Judge
Mooki
Urgent application to enforce restraint and confidentiality undertakings failed because the applicant did not prove access to or misuse of confidential information.
Axon Group 222 (Pty) Ltd and Another v Van Der Kooi and Another (2025-077606) [2025] ZAGPPHC 640 (20 June 2025)
Court
North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
Case number
2025-077606
Judge
N. Rajab-Budlender
The High Court struck an urgent interdict application from the roll, finding the Applicants delayed too long after learning of the alleged restraint breach.
Eazi Access Rental (Pty) Ltd v Suleman and Another (2025/009793) [2025] ZALCJHB 192 (12 May 2025)
Court
Labour Court Johannesburg
Case number
2025/009793
Judge
G Mafa-Chali
The Court found that the Applicant established a protectable interest in its confidential information and customer connections, which the First Respondent had access to during his employment. The First Respondent's employment with the Second Respondent, a direct competitor, created a reasonable apprehension of harm to the Applicant's business interests. The restraint of trade agreement was reasonable in duration (12 months) and geographical scope (South Africa), and the First Respondent did not discharge the onus to prove unreasonableness or that enforcement would be contrary to public policy…
Kabamba v MEC for Health North West (2936/2019) [2025] ZANWHC 78 (2 May 2025)
Court
North West High Court, Mafikeng
Case number
2936/2019
Judge
JT Djaje
The court found that the plaintiff had complied with all contractual requirements, including possession of a valid refugee permit and the requisite letter of endorsement, which was issued once and present in her file. The defendant's refusal to allow the plaintiff to commence work and pay her salary was unlawful, as the contractual conditions had been met. The distinction between the endorsement certificate and the endorsement letter was clarified, with the letter being the relevant document for employment purposes. The court held that the contract commenced upon acceptance of the offer by th…
Kalex Flavours and Ingerdients (Pty) Ltd and Another v Khumalo (2025/047398) [2025] ZAGPJHC 438 (2 May 2025)
Court
South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
Case number
2025/047398
Judge
M V Noko
The High Court struck an urgent restraint-of-trade application from the roll because the applicants gave no satisfactory explanation for the delay in bringing it.
McGee v Rho-Tech (D 369/2023) [2025] ZAKZDHC 11 (12 March 2025)
Court
Kwazulu-Natal High Court, Durban
Case number
D369/2023
Judge
Hlatshwayo AJ
The court found that the plaintiff was contractually entitled to commission on sales made for the defendant and that the defendant had a duty to render an account detailing commissions earned. The incorrect citation of the defendant as a sole proprietor was not fatal, as the defendant was served at its correct address and engaged fully in the litigation; the plaintiff's application to amend the pleadings to reflect the correct legal entity was granted. The special plea of res judicata failed because the Magistrate's Court did not determine the merits of the claim for rendering an account, dis…