Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
5 court collections
Last checked

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Labour Law [2025] ZAGPJHC 753

Paredes-Tarazona v Worley Parsons South Africa (Pty) Ltd (23347/2014)

Paredes-Tarazona v Worley Parsons South Africa (Pty) Ltd (23347/2014) [2025] ZAGPJHC 753 (4 August 2025)

The High Court dismissed an employee’s claim after finding no contract with the defendant and no basis for estoppel, with costs awarded against him.

  • Section 197 Transfer
  • Employment Contract
  • Joinder Of Parties
  • Retrenchment
  • Estoppel
  • Section-197-transfer
Read case analysis
Labour Law [2025] ZALCJHB 294

TWK AGRI (Pty) Ltd v De Lange and Another (2025/072515)

TWK AGRI (Pty) Ltd v De Lange and Another (2025/072515) [2025] ZALCJHB 294 (30 June 2025)

The Labour Court granted an urgent final interdict enforcing a restraint of trade and confidentiality undertaking against a former insurance broker.

  • Restraint Of Trade
  • Confidential Information
  • Final Interdict
  • Employment Contract
  • Solicitation Of Clients
  • Restraint-of-trade
Read case analysis
Labour Law [2025] ZALCJHB 248

Molefe v National Youth Development Agency (NYDA) and Others (2025/084031)

Molefe v National Youth Development Agency (NYDA) and Others (2025/084031) [2025] ZALCJHB 248 (24 June 2025)

The Labour Court dismissed an urgent bid to interdict the NYDA from filling a post after an offer of employment was withdrawn, finding no prima facie right or balance of convenience.

  • Interim Interdict
  • Specific Performance
  • Unlawful Dismissal
  • Section 158 1 H Lra
  • Employment Contract
  • Separation Of Powers
Read case analysis
Commercial And Corporate [2025] ZAGPPHC 699

Lynnwood Hair and Beauty t/a Skin PhD Lynnwood Bridge v Maseko (069613/2025)

Lynnwood Hair and Beauty t/a Skin PhD Lynnwood Bridge v Maseko (069613/2025) [2025] ZAGPPHC 699 (24 June 2025)

Urgent application to enforce restraint and confidentiality undertakings failed because the applicant did not prove access to or misuse of confidential information.

  • Restraint Of Trade
  • Confidential Information
  • Unlawful Competition
  • Employment Contract
  • Urgent Interdict
  • Restraint-of-trade
Read case analysis
Commercial And Corporate [2025] ZAGPPHC 640

Axon Group 222 (Pty) Ltd and Another v Van Der Kooi and Another (2025-077606)

Axon Group 222 (Pty) Ltd and Another v Van Der Kooi and Another (2025-077606) [2025] ZAGPPHC 640 (20 June 2025)

The High Court struck an urgent interdict application from the roll, finding the Applicants delayed too long after learning of the alleged restraint breach.

  • Restraint Of Trade
  • Urgent Interdict
  • Employment Contract
  • Confidential Information
  • Unlawful Competition
  • Restraint-of-trade
Read case analysis
Labour Law [2025] ZALCJHB 192

Eazi Access Rental (Pty) Ltd v Suleman and Another (2025/009793)

Eazi Access Rental (Pty) Ltd v Suleman and Another (2025/009793) [2025] ZALCJHB 192 (12 May 2025)

The Court found that the Applicant established a protectable interest in its confidential information and customer connections, which the First Respondent had access to during his employment. The First Respondent's employment with the Second Respondent, a direct competitor, created a reasonable apprehension of harm to the Applicant's business interests. The restraint of trade agreement was reasonable in duration (12 months) and geographical scope (South Africa), and the First Respondent did not discharge the onus to prove unreasonableness or that enforcement would be contrary to public policy…

  • Restraint Of Trade
  • Confidential Information
  • Protectable Interest
  • Urgent Interdict
  • Employment Contract
  • Customer Connections
Read case analysis
Labour Law [2025] ZANWHC 78

Kabamba v MEC for Health North West (2936/2019)

Kabamba v MEC for Health North West (2936/2019) [2025] ZANWHC 78 (2 May 2025)

The court found that the plaintiff had complied with all contractual requirements, including possession of a valid refugee permit and the requisite letter of endorsement, which was issued once and present in her file. The defendant's refusal to allow the plaintiff to commence work and pay her salary was unlawful, as the contractual conditions had been met. The distinction between the endorsement certificate and the endorsement letter was clarified, with the letter being the relevant document for employment purposes. The court held that the contract commenced upon acceptance of the offer by th…

  • Specific Performance
  • Employment Contract
  • Arrear Remuneration
  • Refugee Permit
  • Endorsement Letter
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2025] ZAGPJHC 438

Kalex Flavours and Ingerdients (Pty) Ltd and Another v Khumalo (2025/047398)

Kalex Flavours and Ingerdients (Pty) Ltd and Another v Khumalo (2025/047398) [2025] ZAGPJHC 438 (2 May 2025)

The High Court struck an urgent restraint-of-trade application from the roll because the applicants gave no satisfactory explanation for the delay in bringing it.

  • Restraint Of Trade
  • Urgent Interdict
  • Employment Contract
  • Self Created Urgency
  • Restraint-of-trade
  • Urgent-application
Read case analysis
Commercial And Corporate [2025] ZAGPJHC 342

Vitality Corporate Services Limited and Another v Moroke (2021/26383)

Vitality Corporate Services Limited and Another v Moroke (2021/26383) [2025] ZAGPJHC 342 (26 March 2025)

The High Court ordered repayment of a R500,000 sign-on bonus after the employee resigned shortly after starting employment and her defences failed.

  • Employment Contract
  • Sign On Bonus
  • Misrepresentation
  • Repudiation
  • Jurisdiction
  • Companies Act
Read case analysis
Labour Law [2025] ZAKZDHC 11

McGee v Rho-Tech (D 369/2023)

McGee v Rho-Tech (D 369/2023) [2025] ZAKZDHC 11 (12 March 2025)

The court found that the plaintiff was contractually entitled to commission on sales made for the defendant and that the defendant had a duty to render an account detailing commissions earned. The incorrect citation of the defendant as a sole proprietor was not fatal, as the defendant was served at its correct address and engaged fully in the litigation; the plaintiff's application to amend the pleadings to reflect the correct legal entity was granted. The special plea of res judicata failed because the Magistrate's Court did not determine the merits of the claim for rendering an account, dis…

  • Employment Contract
  • Commission Claim
  • Rendering Of Account
  • Amendment Of Pleadings
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.