Philani-Ma-Afrika and Others v Mailula and Others (674/08) [2009] ZASCA 115; 2010 (2) SA 573 (SCA) ; [2010] 1 All SA 459 (SCA) (25 September 2009)
The Supreme Court of Appeal found that the sale and transfer of Angus Mansions to Mr Mailula were invalid, as the purported directors lacked authority and the necessary resolutions were not properly passed. The documents relied upon to evidence authority were unauthenticated, incoherent, and did not confer valid powers. The company structure had collapsed, with only five registered members remaining, and no valid power of attorney existed. The par delictum rule did not preclude Philani from obtaining relief, as it was not complicit in any fraud. The appeal was allowed, the sale and transfer set aside, and the property declared to be owned by Philani. The eviction order was also set aside,...
- Citation
- [2009] ZASCA 115
- Parties
- Appellant: Philani-Ma-Afrika; Appellant: Residents of Angus Mansions; Respondent: W M Mailula; Respondent: Trust for Urban Housing Finance; Respondent: J N Bhana & Associates; Respondent: Registrar of Deeds; Respondent: The City of Johannesburg
- Court
- Supreme Court of Appeal
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 25 September 2009
- Case Number
- 674/08
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Johannesburg High Court; Judgment Delivered After Hearing on 26 May 2009
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed with costs; sale and transfer of Angus Mansions set aside; property declared owned by Philani-Ma-Afrika; eviction application dismissed.
- Judges
- Farlam, Navsa, Mlambo, Snyders, Tshiqi
- Legal Topics
- Invalid Transfer of Property, Corporate Governance, Eviction Order, Par Delictum Rule, Authority of Directors, Appealability of Orders
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Philani-Ma-Afrika
Appellant
Residents of Angus Mansions
Appellant
W M Mailula
Respondent
Trust for Urban Housing Finance
Respondent
J N Bhana & Associates
Respondent
Registrar of Deeds
Respondent
The City of Johannesburg
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Johannesburg High Court; Judgment Delivered After Hearing on 26 May 2009
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sale and transfer of Angus Mansions to Mr Mailula were valid and duly authorised.
- 2 Whether Philani-Ma-Afrika was entitled to have the sale and transfer set aside and the property declared as its own.
- 3 Whether the eviction order granted against the residents was valid.
Ratio Decidendi
The Supreme Court of Appeal found that the sale and transfer of Angus Mansions to Mr Mailula were invalid, as the purported directors lacked authority and the necessary resolutions were not properly passed. The documents relied upon to evidence authority were unauthenticated, incoherent, and did not confer valid powers. The company structure had collapsed, with only five registered members remaining, and no valid power of attorney existed. The par delictum rule did not preclude Philani from obtaining relief, as it was not complicit in any fraud. The appeal was allowed, the sale and transfer set aside, and the property declared to be owned by Philani. The eviction order was also set aside,...
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed with costs; sale and transfer of Angus Mansions set aside; property declared owned by Philani-Ma-Afrika; eviction application dismissed.
Orders
- The appeal is allowed with costs, including those occasioned by the employment of two counsel.
- The order made by the court a quo in case 2008/14341 (the Philani application) is set aside and replaced by an order setting aside the sale of erf No 4562 Johannesburg, cancelling Deed of Transfer no T033425/07, declaring the property owned by the applicant, and ordering the first and second respondents to pay the...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment