Polokwane Municipality v Double Four Properties and Another ; Broadlands Home Owners Association NPC v Double Four Properties and Another (879/2022; 913/2022) [2023] ZASCA 158 (23 November 2023)
The Supreme Court of Appeal held that the orders of the high court were interim and interlocutory in nature and did not constitute final orders appealable to this court. The order requiring the municipality to provide a sewer connection did not compel unlawful conduct, as it did not absolve Double Four from compliance with the By-laws. The order requiring Broadlands to reconnect the sewer system was an interim measure to address a public health issue and did not impose a final duty or deprive Broadlands of the opportunity to seek compensation. The referral to evidence regarding compensation for encroachment was not a final order but a procedural step to bring the proceedings to finality....
- Citation
- [2023] ZASCA 158
- Parties
- Appellant: Polokwane Municipality; Appellant: Broadlands Home Owners Association NPC; Respondent: Double Four Properties; Respondent: Broadlands Home Owners Association NPC; Respondent: Polokwane Municipality
- Court
- Supreme Court of Appeal
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 23 November 2023
- Case Number
- 879/2022; 913/2022
- Procedural Posture
- Leave to Appeal / Application for Special Leave to Appeal Against Interim and Interlocutory Orders
- Outcome
- Applications for special leave to appeal in case no 879/2022 and case no 913/2022 are dismissed with costs, including the costs of two counsel where so employed.
- Judges
- Mocumie, Nicholls, Goosen, Koen, Unterhalter
- Legal Topics
- Interim Interdict, Appealability of Orders, Municipal by Laws, Encroachment, Compensation for Encroachment
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Polokwane Municipality
Appellant
Broadlands Home Owners Association NPC
Appellant
Double Four Properties
Respondent
Broadlands Home Owners Association NPC
Respondent
Polokwane Municipality
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Leave to Appeal / Application for Special Leave to Appeal Against Interim and Interlocutory Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the interim and interlocutory orders granted by the high court are appealable to the Supreme Court of Appeal.
- 2 Whether special leave to appeal should be granted to the municipality and Broadlands.
- 3 Whether the high court's order requiring the municipality to provide a sewer connection contravenes municipal by-laws.
Ratio Decidendi
The Supreme Court of Appeal held that the orders of the high court were interim and interlocutory in nature and did not constitute final orders appealable to this court. The order requiring the municipality to provide a sewer connection did not compel unlawful conduct, as it did not absolve Double Four from compliance with the By-laws. The order requiring Broadlands to reconnect the sewer system was an interim measure to address a public health issue and did not impose a final duty or deprive Broadlands of the opportunity to seek compensation. The referral to evidence regarding compensation for encroachment was not a final order but a procedural step to bring the proceedings to finality....
Court Disposition
Applications for special leave to appeal in case no 879/2022 and case no 913/2022 are dismissed with costs, including the costs of two counsel where so employed.
Orders
- The applications for special leave to appeal in case no 879/2022 and case no 913/2022 are dismissed with costs, such costs to include the costs of two counsel, where so employed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment