Posthumus and Another v Master of the High Court, Johannesburg and Others (30268/2018) [2019] ZAGPJHC 424 (25 June 2019)
The court held that the Administration of Estates Act does not require a formal nomination or application for appointment as executor when no notice is published. The Master is empowered to appoint any person deemed fit and proper, and must consider all candidates who have made themselves known, including both the first applicant and the second respondent. The applicants failed to establish a legal basis for exclusive consideration of the first applicant, and their argument that the second respondent could not be considered due to lack of nomination or application was incorrect. The Master must exercise discretion and may use the statutory hierarchy as a guideline, but is not bound by it...
- Citation
- [2019] ZAGPJHC 424
- Parties
- Applicant: Michael Clayton Posthumus; Applicant: Johnathan Brian Posthumus; Respondent: The Master of the High Court, Johannesburg; Respondent: Maria Posthumus; Respondent: Annalise Neyt
- Court
- South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 25 June 2019
- Case Number
- 30268/2018
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Application / Opposed Motion for Declaratory and Mandatory Relief
- Outcome
- Application partially granted. The Master is ordered to consider both the first applicant and the second respondent for appointment as executor. Costs orders made against the applicants for urgent application and affidavits; each party to pay own remaining costs.
- Judges
- Yacoob
- Legal Topics
- Appointment of Executor, Administration of Estates Act, Nomination of Executor, Fit and Proper Test, Costs Order
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Michael Clayton Posthumus
Applicant
Johnathan Brian Posthumus
Applicant
The Master of the High Court, Johannesburg
Respondent
Maria Posthumus
Respondent
Annalise Neyt
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / Opposed Motion for Declaratory and Mandatory Relief
Legal Issues
- 1 Is the Master of the High Court obliged to consider the nomination of the first applicant as executor before appointing an executor in the deceased estate?
- 2 Can the second respondent be considered for appointment as executor in the absence of a formal nomination or application?
- 3 Does the Administration of Estates Act prescribe a mandatory procedure for such appointments when no notice is published?
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the Administration of Estates Act does not require a formal nomination or application for appointment as executor when no notice is published. The Master is empowered to appoint any person deemed fit and proper, and must consider all candidates who have made themselves known, including both the first applicant and the second respondent. The applicants failed to establish a legal basis for exclusive consideration of the first applicant, and their argument that the second respondent could not be considered due to lack of nomination or application was incorrect. The Master must exercise discretion and may use the statutory hierarchy as a guideline, but is not bound by it...
Court Disposition
Application partially granted. The Master is ordered to consider both the first applicant and the second respondent for appointment as executor. Costs orders made against the applicants for urgent application and affidavits; each party to pay own remaining costs.
Orders
- The Master is to consider both the first applicant, Michael Clayton Posthumus, and the second respondent, Maria Posthumus, as potential executors in the deceased estate of the late Gerhardus Roedolf Posthumus (Master’s reference 006444/2016), and thereafter decide who to appoint in terms of section 18(1) of the...
- The applicants are to pay the costs of the urgent application.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment