Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
6 court collections
Last checked

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Civil Procedure [2025] ZAWCHC 60

South African Legal Practice Council v Swartz (15857/2023)

South African Legal Practice Council v Swartz (15857/2023) [2025] ZAWCHC 60 (21 February 2025)

The High Court held the Legal Practice Council was not bound by its disciplinary committee and granted a wholly suspended three-year suspension, not strike-off.

  • Legal Practitioner Misconduct
  • Fit And Proper Test
  • Disciplinary Committee Powers
  • Legal Practice Act
  • Dishonesty
  • Sanctions For Professional Misconduct
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2024] ZAFSHC 149

South African Legal Practice Council v Myburgh (4394/2023)

South African Legal Practice Council v Myburgh (4394/2023) [2024] ZAFSHC 149 (20 May 2024)

The High Court struck an attorney off the roll after finding misappropriation of trust funds, misleading the Council under oath, and failure to obtain a Fidelity Fund Certificate.

  • Legal Practitioner Misconduct
  • Misappropriation Of Trust Funds
  • Fit And Proper Test
  • Disciplinary Proceedings
  • Fidelity Fund Certificate
  • Legal-practitioner-misconduct
Read case analysis
Administrative Law [2023] ZAGPPHC 1144

Legal Practice Council v Mkhize (13881/2021; 13204/2022)

Legal Practice Council v Mkhize (13881/2021; 13204/2022) [2023] ZAGPPHC 1144; 2024 (1) SA 189 (GP) (8 September 2023)

The Court found, on a preponderance of probabilities, that Mr Mkhize repeatedly accepted instructions and payments directly from members of the public without the involvement of an attorney, in clear contravention of section 34 of the Legal Practice Act. The evidence included receipts, letters of engagement, and corroborating complaints. Mr Mkhize's defence that his administrators acted without his knowledge was rejected as fanciful and inconsistent, and he failed to exercise necessary oversight over his practice. The Court further found that Mr Mkhize persistently failed to comply with court…

  • Legal Practitioners Misconduct
  • Referral Rule
  • Fit And Proper Test
  • Disciplinary Sanctions
  • Court Orders Noncompliance
Read case analysis
Banking And Finance [2023] ZANCT 60

Swuhana v National Credit Regulator (NCT/253200/2022/59(1))

Swuhana v National Credit Regulator (NCT/253200/2022/59(1)) [2023] ZANCT 60 (30 July 2023)

The Tribunal reviewed and set aside the NCR’s decision to hold a debt counsellor registration application in abeyance, but refused to order immediate registration.

  • Debt Counsellor Registration
  • National Credit Act
  • Administrative Review
  • Fit And Proper Test
  • Debt-counsellor-registration
  • National-credit-act
Read case analysis
Administrative Law [2022] ZAGPPHC 493

Fernandes v Niel N.O. and Others (8923/2021)

Fernandes v Niel N.O. and Others (8923/2021) [2022] ZAGPPHC 493 (15 July 2022)

The court found that the Applicant failed to demonstrate actual bias or a reasonable apprehension of bias on the part of the First Respondent. The use of terms such as 'suspicions' and 'money laundering' by the First Respondent was contextual and did not indicate a foregone conclusion or partiality. The First Respondent withdrew the term 'money laundering' and explained its use, which the court found satisfactory. The Applicant and his attorney did not object to the summons or the proceedings until after substantive questioning had commenced, missing opportunities to challenge the process. Th…

  • Recusal Of Commissioner
  • Reasonable Apprehension Of Bias
  • Fit And Proper Test
  • Punitive Costs
  • Companies Act Enquiry
Read case analysis
Commercial And Corporate [2021] ZAMPMHC 41

South African Legal Practice Council v Thobane (87/2020)

South African Legal Practice Council v Thobane (87/2020) [2021] ZAMPMHC 41 (14 May 2021)

The High Court suspended an attorney for repeated non-compliance with audit, fidelity fund, fee, and client-accounting duties, with further restrictions on practice.

  • Legal Practitioners Conduct
  • Fit And Proper Test
  • Fidelity Fund Certificate
  • Auditor Reports
  • Client Accounting
  • Disciplinary Sanctions
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2019] ZAGPPHC 609

Law Society of the Northern Provinces v Mphela (2018/61533)

Law Society of the Northern Provinces v Mphela (2018/61533) [2019] ZAGPPHC 609 (12 November 2019)

The High Court struck an attorney off the roll after finding a large trust deficit, poor accounting records, and conduct showing he was not fit to practise.

  • Attorneys Act Striking Off
  • Trust Account Misappropriation
  • Professional Misconduct
  • Fit And Proper Test
  • Attorneys-act-striking-off
  • Trust-account-misappropriation
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2019] ZAGPJHC 424

Posthumus and Another v Master of the High Court, Johannesburg and Others (30268/2018)

Posthumus and Another v Master of the High Court, Johannesburg and Others (30268/2018) [2019] ZAGPJHC 424 (25 June 2019)

The High Court held that the Master had to consider both the nominated son and the surviving spouse as potential executors in the deceased estate.

  • Appointment Of Executor
  • Administration Of Estates Act
  • Nomination Of Executor
  • Fit And Proper Test
  • Costs Order
  • Executor-appointment
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2019] ZAGPPHC 123

Law Society of Northern Provinces v Mashaba and Others (23258/2018)

Law Society of Northern Provinces v Mashaba and Others (23258/2018) [2019] ZAGPPHC 123 (4 April 2019)

The court struck an attorney from the roll after finding he submitted fictitious invoices and misappropriated funds, making him unfit to practise.

  • Attorneys Act Striking Off
  • Professional Misconduct
  • Fraudulent Invoices
  • Fit And Proper Test
  • Curatorship Of Trust Accounts
  • Attorneys-act-striking-off
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.