Ramkistan and Another v Standard Bank of South Africa (D2490/2022;D4744/2022) [2023] ZAKZDHC 55 (10 August 2023)

Ramkistan and Another v Standard Bank of South Africa (D2490/2022;D4744/2022) [2023] ZAKZDHC 55 (10 August 2023)

The court found that the applicants failed to establish entitlement to costs for withdrawn cases, as the relevant proceedings were either pending or decided in the regional court, outside the High Court's jurisdiction. The interdict sought against Standard Bank was dismissed for lack of specificity and failure to meet interim relief requirements. The High Court lacked jurisdiction to grant a protection order for harassment, which falls under the Magistrate's Court, and no evidence was provided that Standard Bank itself committed harassment. The damages claims against both respondents were dismissed due to lack of particularity, failure to comply with pleading requirements, and...

Citation
[2023] ZAKZDHC 55
Parties
Applicant: Avinash Ramkistan; Applicant: Reviansa Investments CC; Respondent: Standard Bank of South Africa; Respondent: Financial Services Conduct Authority
Court
Kwazulu-Natal High Court, Durban
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
10 August 2023
Case Number
D2490/2022;D4744/2022
Procedural Posture
Review Application / Judgment
Outcome
Both applications are dismissed with costs.
Judges
N.Z. Kuzwayo
Legal Topics
Locus Standi, Damages Claims, Protection From Harassment Act, National Credit Act, Administrative Review, Fit and Proper Requirements
Civil Procedure Banking and Finance Commercial and Corporate Locus Standi Damages Claims Protection From Harassment Act National Credit Act Administrative Review +1 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 15 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Avinash Ramkistan

Applicant

Reviansa Investments CC

Applicant

Standard Bank of South Africa

Respondent

Financial Services Conduct Authority

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Review Application / Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the applicants are entitled to costs for withdrawn cases instituted by Standard Bank.
  2. 2 Whether the applicants are entitled to an interdict preventing Standard Bank from lodging further cases until another matter is heard.
  3. 3 Whether the High Court has jurisdiction to grant a protection order for harassment under the Protection from Harassment Act.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicants failed to establish entitlement to costs for withdrawn cases, as the relevant proceedings were either pending or decided in the regional court, outside the High Court's jurisdiction. The interdict sought against Standard Bank was dismissed for lack of specificity and failure to meet interim relief requirements. The High Court lacked jurisdiction to grant a protection order for harassment, which falls under the Magistrate's Court, and no evidence was provided that Standard Bank itself committed harassment. The damages claims against both respondents were dismissed due to lack of particularity, failure to comply with pleading requirements, and...

Court Disposition

Both applications are dismissed with costs.

Orders

  • Both applications are dismissed with costs.