Download PDF

South Africa Judgment

Competition Tribunal

Rustenburg Platinum Mines Limited v The Mototolo Chrome Recovery Circuit (LM157Aug18) [2018] ZACT 55 (23 October 2018)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The Tribunal found that the transaction represents a shift from joint to sole control of the Mototolo mine, but does not alter the structure or incentives in the relevant markets for PGMs or chrome ore. Existing supply agreements ensure continuity of relationships, and the market share accretion is negligible. The Commission's investigation confirmed that there will be no negative impact on employment and no other public interest concerns arise. Accordingly, the Tribunal concluded that the merger is unlikely to substantially prevent or lessen competition and does not raise public interest issues. The merger was approved unconditionally.

Court disposition

Merger approved unconditionally.

Orders

  • The proposed transaction is approved without conditions.

02

Material facts

Parties

Rustenburg Platinum Mines Limited

Applicant Counsel: Anton Roets

The Mototolo Joint Venture

Respondent

Mototolo Chrome Recovery Circuit

Respondent

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Large Merger Application / Approval

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
The applicant submits that the transaction will enable access to adjacent mining opportunities without delay and will not negatively impact employment. The acquisition is intended to consolidate control and streamline operations. The applicant plans to acquire the remaining minority interest in due course.
Respondent
Glencore, as the main respondent, contends that PGM activities are non-core to its South African operations and is therefore disposing of its interests. The respondent maintains that existing supply relationships will continue post-merger and that the transaction will not alter competitive dynamics or public interest factors.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Competition Act 89 of 1998

    A merger may only be prohibited if it is likely to substantially prevent or lessen competition in any relevant market, taking into account market structure and post-merger incentives.

  2. 02

    Competition Act 89 of 1998

    Public interest considerations, including employment effects, must be assessed in merger proceedings.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The Tribunal found that the transaction represents a shift from joint to sole control of the Mototolo mine, but does not alter the structure or incentives in the relevant markets for PGMs or chrome ore. Existing supply agreements ensure continuity of relationships, and the market share accretion is negligible. The Commission's investigation confirmed that there will be no negative impact on employment and no other public interest concerns arise. Accordingly, the Tribunal concluded that the merger is unlikely to substantially prevent or lessen competition and does not raise public interest issues. The merger was approved unconditionally.

Obiter and limits

  • The Tribunal noted that the transaction may enable the merging parties to pursue new mining activities, which could have a positive effect on employment.
  • No concerns were raised by trade unions regarding the transaction, indicating stakeholder acceptance.

Court disposition

Merger approved unconditionally.

  • The proposed transaction is approved without conditions.

Source and reliance status

Competition Tribunal

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

Competition Tribunal

Judgment

[2018] ZACT 55

COMPETITION TRIBUNAL OF SOUTH

AFRICA

Case No: LM157Aug18

In the matter between

Rustenburg Platinum Mines Limited

Primary Acquiring Firm

And

The Mototolo Joint Venture

and

Mototolo Chrome Recovery Circuit

Primary Target Firms

Panel

: Mr Norman Manoim (Presiding Member)

: Ms Yasmin Carrim (Tribunal Member)

: Mr Halton Cheadle (Tribunal Member)

Heard on

: 17 October 2018

Order Issued on : 17 October 2018 Reasons Issued on : 23 October 2018

REASONS

FOR DECISION

Approval

[1] On 7 February 2018, the Competition Tribunal ("the Tribunal") unconditionally approved the large merger in terms of which

Rustenburg Platinum Mines Limited ("RPM") acquired the Mototolo Joint Venture ("Mototolo JV') as well as all of the movable assets of the Mototolo Chrome Recovery Circuit.

[2] The reasons for the approval follow.

Parties to the transaction and their activities

Primary acquiring firm

[3] The primary acquiring firm is RPM, a wholly owned subsidiary of Anglo American Platinum Limited ("AAP"), which is itself an indirect subsidiary of Anglo American pie ("Anglo American"). Anglo American is a public mining company listed on the London Stock Exchange, with secondary listings in South Africa, Switzerland, Botswana and Namibia. AAP is a producer of Platinum Group Metals ("PGMs"), with extraction, smelting and refining capabilities.

[4] RPM's activities include the operation of smelting operations and metal refining facilities. RPM also holds a 50% interest in the Mototolo JV. All the ore extracted from the Mototolo mine is processed into PGM concentrate through concentrating facilities run by RPM. RPM does not offer refining services to third parties to any meaningful extent.

Primary target firm

[5] The primary target firm is the Mototolo JV a joint venture created to own and run the Mototolo mine, which produces PGM ore as well as a number of precious metal ores (including chrome) as a by-product.

[6] The Mototolo JV is currently jointly controlled by RPM and the Glencore Kagiso Platinum Partnership ("GKPP") with 50% each. Of the 50% held by the GKPP, 40.24% is held by Glencore Operations South Africa (Pty) Ltd ("Glencore") while the remaining 9.76% is held by Kagiso Tiso Holdings (Ply) Ltd ("Kagiso Tiso").

[7] Also included in the transaction is Glencore's 50% share in the chrome produced by the Mototolo JV as well as all of the movable assets of the Mototolo Chrome Recovery Circuit, which are wholly owned and operated by Glencore. The immovable assets of the Chrome Recovery Circuit are already owned by RPM.

Proposed transaction and rationale

[8] In terms of the proposed transaction, RPM will acquire Glencore's entire interest in the Mototolo JV, Glencore's 50% interest in the chrome ore produced by the Mototolo JV as well as the movable portions of the Mototolo Chrome Recovery Circuit. Thus, post-merger RPM will own: 90.24% interest in the Mototolo JV, all of the rights to the chrome produced by the JV and the entirety of the Mototolo Chrome Recovery Circuit. RPM has submitted it plans to acquire the remaining 9.76% of the target firm from Kagiso Tiso in due course.

[9] RPM submits that the transaction will allow it to access adjacent mining opportunities without having to wait for the Mototolo JV's activities to end. Glencore submits that the PGM activities are non-core to their South African operations and are thus disposing of the assets.

Relevant market and impact on competition

[10] The Commission analysed the markets for the production and supply of a number of PGMs (platinum, palladium, rhodium) as well as the market for the production and supply of chrome ore.

[11] The Commission is of the opinion that the merger is unlikely to affect the structure or incentives in any relevant market because the transaction represents a move from joint to sole control of the Mototolo mine.

[12] Further, the pre-merger supply relationships that exist between the merging parties and Glencore will continue to exist post-merger through supply agreements. In terms of these supply agreements, RPM will continue to provide all of the chrome ore produced by the target firms to Glencore post-merger. Consequently, all of the PGM ore extracted from the Mototolo mine will remain with RPM for use at its own concentration facilities while all of the chrome ore is sold to Glencore.

[13] Notwithstanding the above, the Commission analysed the relevant market shares and concluded that the share accretion represented by the Mototolo JV is in any case negligible and there will continue to be strong competition in the relevant markets post-merger.

Public interest

[14] The Merging parties submit that the proposed transaction will have no negative impact on employment. The Commission contacted all relevant trade unions and no concerns were raised. The Commission is satisfied that there will be no job losses and found that the transaction will likely allow the merging parties to pursue new mining activities and thus have a positive effect on employment.

[15] No other public interest concerns arise out of the transaction.

Conclusion

[16] In light of the above, we conclude that the proposed transaction is unlikely to substantially prevent or lessen competition in any relevant market. In addition, no public interest issues arise from the proposed transaction. Accordingly, we approve the proposed transaction unconditionally.

Mr Norman Manoim

Ms Yasmin Carrim and Mr Halton Cheadle

23 October 2018

Date

Tribunal Researcher: Jonathan Thomson

For the merging parties Anton Roets of Nortons Inc.

For the Commission: Portia Bele

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Competition Act 89 of 1998

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.