Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
1 court collection
Last checked

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Competition Law [2021] ZACT 35

Prepaid Company (Pty) Ltd v GloCell Distribution (LM210Mar21)

Prepaid Company (Pty) Ltd v GloCell Distribution (LM210Mar21) [2021] ZACT 35 (21 April 2021)

The Competition Tribunal unconditionally approved TPC’s acquisition of additional shares in GloCell Distribution, finding no substantial competition or public interest concerns.

  • Large Merger Review
  • Market Share Analysis
  • Public Interest Assessment
  • Sole Control Acquisition
  • Large-merger-review
  • Market-share-analysis
Read case analysis
Competition Law [2021] ZACT 11

IVY 2 Investments VCC v New Holdco, a new company formed for the purposes of this transaction (LM184Jan21)

IVY 2 Investments VCC v New Holdco, a new company formed for the purposes of this transaction (LM184Jan21) [2021] ZACT 11 (24 February 2021)

The Competition Tribunal unconditionally approved a large merger between IVY 2 Investments VCC and New Holdco, finding no competition or public interest concerns.

  • Large Merger Review
  • Market Structure Assessment
  • Public Interest
  • Cartel Investigation
  • Sole Control Acquisition
  • Large-merger-review
Read case analysis
Competition Law [2020] ZACT 29

EA Waterfall Logistics JV Proprietary Limited v Truzen 116 Trust (LM058Jul20)

EA Waterfall Logistics JV Proprietary Limited v Truzen 116 Trust (LM058Jul20) [2020] ZACT 29; [2020] 2 CPLR 745 (CT) (3 September 2020)

The Competition Tribunal approved unconditionally EA Waterfall Logistics’ acquisition of sole control over the Cummins property letting enterprise from Truzen Trust.

  • Large Merger
  • Market Definition
  • Public Interest
  • Horizontal Overlap
  • Sole Control Acquisition
  • Merger-control
Read case analysis
Competition Law [2020] ZACT 27

KLK Landbou Limited v Carpe Diem Raisins (Pty) Ltd (LM059Jul20)

KLK Landbou Limited v Carpe Diem Raisins (Pty) Ltd (LM059Jul20) [2020] ZACT 27; [2020] 2 CPLR 775 (CT) (24 August 2020)

The Competition Tribunal approved KLK Landbou Limited’s acquisition of additional shares in Carpe Diem Raisins, giving it sole control, without conditions.

  • Large Merger
  • Sole Control Acquisition
  • Creeping Merger
  • Public Interest
  • Employment Effects
  • Large-merger
Read case analysis
Competition Law [2020] ZACT 5

Brimstone Investment Corporation Ltd v Firefly Investments 306 (Pty) Ltd (LM137Nov19)

Brimstone Investment Corporation Ltd v Firefly Investments 306 (Pty) Ltd (LM137Nov19) [2020] ZACT 5 (15 January 2020)

The Competition Tribunal unconditionally approved Brimstone’s acquisition of sole control of Firefly, finding no substantial competition or public interest concerns.

  • Large Merger
  • Sole Control Acquisition
  • Market Share Assessment
  • Public Interest
  • Employment Effects
  • Large-merger
Read case analysis
Competition Law [2019] ZACT 49

Telkom SA SOC Ltd v Trudon (Pty) Ltd (LM056Jun19)

Telkom SA SOC Ltd v Trudon (Pty) Ltd (LM056Jun19) [2019] ZACT 49 (22 July 2019)

The Competition Tribunal unconditionally approved Telkom's acquisition of the remaining shares in Trudon, finding no competition or public interest concerns.

  • Merger Control
  • Vertical Relationships
  • Public Interest Analysis
  • Sole Control Acquisition
  • Merger-control
  • Competition-law
Read case analysis
Competition Law [2019] ZACT 10

Liberty Group Ltd and 2 Degrees Properties (Pty) Ltd v Khora Investments (Pty) Ltd in respect of Khora's 30% undivided share in Botshabelo Mall Properties and the Letting business conducted thereon (LM220Nov18)

Liberty Group Ltd and 2 Degrees Properties (Pty) Ltd v Khora Investments (Pty) Ltd in respect of Khora's 30% undivided share in Botshabelo Mall Properties and the Letting business conducted thereon (LM220Nov18) [2019] ZACT 10 (11 February 2019)

The Tribunal approved unconditionally the acquisition of Khora’s 30% share in Botshabelo Mall, finding no substantial competition or public interest concerns.

  • Merger Control
  • Horizontal Overlap
  • Public Interest
  • Sole Control Acquisition
  • Merger-control
  • Horizontal-overlap
Read case analysis
Competition Law [2018] ZACT 55

Rustenburg Platinum Mines Limited v The Mototolo Chrome Recovery Circuit (LM157Aug18)

Rustenburg Platinum Mines Limited v The Mototolo Chrome Recovery Circuit (LM157Aug18) [2018] ZACT 55 (23 October 2018)

The Competition Tribunal unconditionally approved RPM’s acquisition of Glencore’s interests in the Mototolo JV and chrome recovery assets, finding no competition or public interest concerns.

  • Merger Control
  • Sole Control Acquisition
  • Public Interest Assessment
  • Market Share Analysis
  • Merger-control
  • Sole-control-acquisition
Read case analysis
Competition Law [2018] ZACT 29

VKB Agri Processors (Pty) Ltd v VKB Flour Mills (Pty) Ltd (LM041May18)

VKB Agri Processors (Pty) Ltd v VKB Flour Mills (Pty) Ltd (LM041May18) [2018] ZACT 29 (10 July 2018)

The Competition Tribunal unconditionally approved VKB Agri’s acquisition of the remaining shares in VKB Flour Mills, finding no substantial competition or public interest concerns.

  • Merger Control
  • Horizontal Merger
  • Public Interest
  • Sole Control Acquisition
  • Merger-control
  • Horizontal-merger
Read case analysis
Competition Law [2017] ZACT 35

Boundlesstrade 154 Proprietary Limited v AA Group (LM173Nov16)

Boundlesstrade 154 Proprietary Limited v AA Group (LM173Nov16) [2017] ZACT 35 (6 March 2017)

The Competition Tribunal unconditionally approved Boundlesstrade’s acquisition of sole control of AA Group, finding no substantial lessening of competition or public interest concerns.

  • Large Merger
  • Market Share Accretion
  • Joint Venture Termination
  • Public Interest
  • Sole Control Acquisition
  • Large-merger
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.