S v Booi and Others (CC6/2016) [2016] ZAECPEHC 61 (22 September 2016)

S v Booi and Others (CC6/2016) [2016] ZAECPEHC 61 (22 September 2016)

The court found that the State's case, though based on circumstantial evidence and electronic data, was cogent and reliable. The cell phone records, corroborated by admissions and witness testimony, established communication and coordination between the accused, particularly on the day of the murder. The evidence proved that accused no. 2, while incarcerated, orchestrated the murder through telephonic contact with his co-accused and his girlfriend, Mange. The movements of accused no. 3 and 4, as shown by cell tower data, placed them at the scene at the relevant time. The court rejected the accused's denials and found their explanations implausible and inconsistent with the objective...

Citation
[2016] ZAECPEHC 61
Parties
Applicant: The State; Defendant: Ndumiso Booi; Defendant: Mzolimo Makisi; Defendant: Mawethu Khaka
Court
Eastern Cape High Court, Port Elizabeth
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
22 September 2016
Case Number
CC6/2016
Procedural Posture
Criminal Trial / Judgment After Full Trial
Outcome
Accused no. 2 is found guilty on counts 1, 2, 3 and 5 and not guilty on count 4. Accused no. 3 is found guilty on counts 5, 6 and 7 and not guilty on count 4. Accused no. 4 is found guilty on counts 5, 6 and 7 and not guilty on count 4.
Judges
Chetty
Legal Topics
Murder, Conspiracy to Commit Murder, Robbery With Aggravating Circumstances, Unlawful Possession of Firearm, Unlawful Possession of Ammunition, Admissibility of Electronic Evidence
Criminal Law Murder Conspiracy to Commit Murder Robbery With Aggravating Circumstances Unlawful Possession of Firearm Unlawful Possession of Ammunition Admissibility of Electronic Evidence

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 9 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

The State

Applicant

Ndumiso Booi

Defendant

Mzolimo Makisi

Defendant

Mawethu Khaka

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Trial / Judgment After Full Trial

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the accused conspired to murder Zanele Jonga.
  2. 2 Whether the accused committed the murder of Zanele Jonga.
  3. 3 Whether the accused unlawfully possessed firearms and ammunition.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the State's case, though based on circumstantial evidence and electronic data, was cogent and reliable. The cell phone records, corroborated by admissions and witness testimony, established communication and coordination between the accused, particularly on the day of the murder. The evidence proved that accused no. 2, while incarcerated, orchestrated the murder through telephonic contact with his co-accused and his girlfriend, Mange. The movements of accused no. 3 and 4, as shown by cell tower data, placed them at the scene at the relevant time. The court rejected the accused's denials and found their explanations implausible and inconsistent with the objective...

Court Disposition

Accused no. 2 is found guilty on counts 1, 2, 3 and 5 and not guilty on count 4. Accused no. 3 is found guilty on counts 5, 6 and 7 and not guilty on count 4. Accused no. 4 is found guilty on counts 5, 6 and 7 and not guilty on count 4.

Orders

  • Accused no. 2 is convicted on counts 1 (robbery), 2 (unlawful possession of firearm), 3 (unlawful possession of ammunition), and 5 (murder); acquitted on count 4 (conspiracy to commit murder).
  • Accused no. 3 is convicted on counts 5 (murder), 6 (unlawful possession of firearm), and 7 (unlawful possession of ammunition); acquitted on count 4.