S v Horne and Another (CC3/2018) [2018] ZAECPEHC 45 (13 August 2018)

S v Horne and Another (CC3/2018) [2018] ZAECPEHC 45 (13 August 2018)

The court found accused no. 1's version of events to be a fabrication, especially in light of the gunpowder residue on his hands and his recanted alibi. The evidence, including accomplice testimony from accused no. 2 and forensic results, established that accused no. 1 fired multiple shots at the deceased with direct intent to kill. Accused no. 2's conduct regarding the firearm was found to be instinctive rather than intended to assist accused no. 1, and there was no legal basis to convict him as an accessory after the fact. Both accused were acquitted of theft due to lack of evidence. Accused no. 1 was convicted of murder and unlawful possession of firearm and ammunition. Accused no. 2...

Citation
[2018] ZAECPEHC 45
Parties
Applicant: The State; Defendant: Shaan Horne; Defendant: Shane Arends
Court
Eastern Cape High Court, Port Elizabeth
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
13 August 2018
Case Number
CC3/2018
Procedural Posture
Criminal Trial / Judgment After Trial
Outcome
Accused no. 1 is convicted of murder and unlawful possession of firearm and ammunition. Accused no. 2 is acquitted of murder and theft but convicted of unlawful possession of firearm and ammunition.
Judges
Chetty
Legal Topics
Murder, Accessory After the Fact, Unlawful Possession of Firearm, Unlawful Possession of Ammunition, Accomplice Evidence, Bail and Alibi
Criminal Law Murder Accessory After the Fact Unlawful Possession of Firearm Unlawful Possession of Ammunition Accomplice Evidence Bail and Alibi

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

The State

Applicant

Shaan Horne

Defendant

Shane Arends

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Trial / Judgment After Trial

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether accused no. 1 committed murder with direct intent.
  2. 2 Whether accused no. 2 is guilty of murder or only of unlawful possession of firearm and ammunition.
  3. 3 Whether accused no. 2 acted as an accessory after the fact.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found accused no. 1's version of events to be a fabrication, especially in light of the gunpowder residue on his hands and his recanted alibi. The evidence, including accomplice testimony from accused no. 2 and forensic results, established that accused no. 1 fired multiple shots at the deceased with direct intent to kill. Accused no. 2's conduct regarding the firearm was found to be instinctive rather than intended to assist accused no. 1, and there was no legal basis to convict him as an accessory after the fact. Both accused were acquitted of theft due to lack of evidence. Accused no. 1 was convicted of murder and unlawful possession of firearm and ammunition. Accused no. 2...

Court Disposition

Accused no. 1 is convicted of murder and unlawful possession of firearm and ammunition. Accused no. 2 is acquitted of murder and theft but convicted of unlawful possession of firearm and ammunition.

Orders

  • On count 1 (theft), both accused are acquitted.
  • On count 2 (murder), accused no. 1 is convicted as charged; accused no. 2 is acquitted.