Modime v S (Appeal) (AA10/2023) [2025] ZALMPPHC 116 (17 June 2025)
Court
Limpopo High Court, Polokwane
Case number
AA10/2023
Judges
G.C Muller, J. Ngobeni, A van Wyk
The High Court partly upheld Philip Modime’s appeal, setting aside the housebreaking conviction but confirming murder and robbery convictions and concurrent sentencing.
Nzima v S (Appeal) (A132/2023) [2025] ZAGPPHC 483 (19 May 2025)
Court
North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
Case number
A132/2023
Judges
N V Khumalo, M M D Lenyai, G N Moshoana
The High Court dismissed Nzima’s appeal against conviction for murder and related offences, holding that the accomplice evidence was reliable and corroborated.
Randell v S (A32/2022) [2024] ZAMPMHC 51 (19 September 2024)
Court
Middelburg High Court, Mpumalanga
Case number
A32/2022
Judges
Mashile, Manthata
The High Court dismissed an appeal against a corruption conviction, holding that the trial court properly treated accomplice evidence and that the State proved guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
S v Nkuna (CC02/2023) [2024] ZAGPPHC 1050 (22 August 2024)
Court
North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
Case number
CC02/2023
Judge
PD. Phahlane
The court found that the State's case rested almost entirely on the evidence of Mr Mathunzi, who was a single witness and an accomplice. His evidence was marked by numerous contradictions, improbabilities, and inconsistencies, both internally and when compared to other witnesses and his own prior statements. The court held that his evidence was of such poor quality that it could not be safely relied upon. No credible evidence linked the accused to the offences charged, nor placed him at the relevant locations. The State failed to establish a prima facie case against the accused, and there was…
Kamfer v S (A73/2024) [2024] ZAWCHC 256 (13 May 2024)
Court
Western Cape High Court, Cape Town
Case number
A73/2024
Judges
Kusevitsky, Katz
Criminal appeal dismissed: the High Court upheld four housebreaking convictions and a 20-year effective sentence, finding no material error in the trial court's assessment of accomplice evidence.
Kgitsane v S (37/2022) [2024] ZAFSHC 62 (23 February 2024)
Court
Free State High Court, Bloemfontein
Case number
37/2022
Judge
Opperman
Leave to appeal was dismissed in a murder, rape, kidnapping, and extortion matter. The court found the accomplice evidence credible and the applicant’s version unsatisfactory.
S v Gqogqo and Another (CC 35/2021) [2024] ZAECELLC 4 (14 February 2024)
Court
Eastern Cape High Court, East London Local Court
Case number
CC 35/2021
Judge
T Malusi
The High Court convicted both accused of murder and unlawful firearm and ammunition possession, but acquitted them of robbery with aggravating circumstances.
S v van der Westhuizen and Others (72/2016) [2024] ZAFSHC 18; 2024 (1) SACR 525 (FB) (15 January 2024)
Court
Free State High Court, Bloemfontein
Case number
72/2016
Judge
Van Zyl
The court held that five section 204 witnesses did not qualify for discharge, but Gawie Coetzer did, after finding only his evidence was frank and honest.