S v Morgan (271/2008) [2008] ZASCA 147; [2009] 2 All SA 158 (SCA) (27 November 2008)

S v Morgan (271/2008) [2008] ZASCA 147; [2009] 2 All SA 158 (SCA) (27 November 2008)

The Supreme Court of Appeal found that, despite contradictions and the potential for gang rivalry to influence testimony, the evidence of the three state witnesses was corroborated on crucial aspects and placed the appellant at the scene of the shooting. Kiranie, who was not a gang member, provided independent confirmation. The alleged conspiracy to falsely implicate the appellant was unsupported by evidence and contradicted by the sequence of witness statements. The appellant's alibi was undermined by the credible identification by witnesses who knew him well. The court held that the case against the appellant was proved beyond reasonable doubt, and speculative suggestions that another...

Citation
[2008] ZASCA 147
Parties
Appellant: Mark Anthony Morgan; Respondent: The State
Court
Supreme Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
27 November 2008
Case Number
271/2008
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal From Conviction and Sentence in the High Court, Witwatersrand Local Division
Outcome
Appeal dismissed; conviction and sentence confirmed.
Judges
Mthiyane, Heher, Ponnan
Legal Topics
Murder, Attempted Murder, Alibi Defence, Assessment of Witness Credibility, Gang Related Offences
Criminal Law Murder Attempted Murder Alibi Defence Assessment of Witness Credibility Gang Related Offences

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mark Anthony Morgan

Appellant

The State

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal From Conviction and Sentence in the High Court, Witwatersrand Local Division

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the appellant was present at the scene and shot the deceased.
  2. 2 Whether the evidence of state witnesses, who were rival gang members, should be accepted despite contradictions.
  3. 3 Whether the alleged conspiracy to falsely implicate the appellant existed.

Ratio Decidendi

The Supreme Court of Appeal found that, despite contradictions and the potential for gang rivalry to influence testimony, the evidence of the three state witnesses was corroborated on crucial aspects and placed the appellant at the scene of the shooting. Kiranie, who was not a gang member, provided independent confirmation. The alleged conspiracy to falsely implicate the appellant was unsupported by evidence and contradicted by the sequence of witness statements. The appellant's alibi was undermined by the credible identification by witnesses who knew him well. The court held that the case against the appellant was proved beyond reasonable doubt, and speculative suggestions that another...

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed; conviction and sentence confirmed.

Orders

  • The appeal is dismissed.