Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
6 court collections
Last checked

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Criminal Law [2025] ZAFSHC 220

Oguh v The State (A151/2023)

Oguh v The State (A151/2023) [2025] ZAFSHC 220 (18 July 2025)

High Court criminal appeal on identification evidence and alibi defence. The conviction for robbery with aggravating circumstances was upheld and the appeal dismissed.

  • Identification Evidence
  • Single Witness
  • Alibi Defence
  • Robbery With Aggravating Circumstances
  • Criminal-appeal
  • Identification-evidence
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [2025] ZAKZPHC 51

Zikhali v S (AR171/2024)

Zikhali v S (AR171/2024) [2025] ZAKZPHC 51 (23 May 2025)

The High Court dismissed an appeal against conviction for murder, but reduced a life sentence to 20 years after finding no proof of premeditation.

  • Murder
  • Alibi Defence
  • Minimum Sentencing
  • Premeditation
  • Gender Based Violence
  • Alibi-defence
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [2025] ZAGPPHC 483

Nzima v S (Appeal) (A132/2023)

Nzima v S (Appeal) (A132/2023) [2025] ZAGPPHC 483 (19 May 2025)

The High Court dismissed Nzima’s appeal against conviction for murder and related offences, holding that the accomplice evidence was reliable and corroborated.

  • Murder
  • Robbery With Aggravating Circumstances
  • Minimum Sentence Act
  • Single Witness Cautionary Rule
  • Accomplice Evidence
  • Alibi Defence
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [2025] ZASCA 57

Gilchrist v S (1153/2021)

Gilchrist v S (1153/2021) [2025] ZASCA 57 (12 May 2025)

The Supreme Court of Appeal held that the trial court complied with s 93ter(1) of the Magistrates’ Court Act, as the record reflected that the appellant’s legal representative confirmed no assessors were required. The appellant was legally represented throughout, and there was no indication he was uninformed of his rights. The application to introduce new evidence based on a recanting affidavit was refused, as the affidavit lacked independent corroboration and was not probably true or reliable. The identification evidence was detailed, corroborated, and the appellant himself conceded that the…

  • Murder
  • Identification Evidence
  • Alibi Defence
  • Magistrates Court Assessors
  • Leave To Introduce New Evidence
  • Firearms Control Act
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [2025] ZAKZPHC 44

Mthethwa v S (Appeal) (AR8/2021)

Mthethwa v S (Appeal) (AR8/2021) [2025] ZAKZPHC 44 (7 May 2025)

Appeal against murder and firearm convictions dismissed. The High Court upheld the trial court’s findings on assessors, identification evidence, alibi, and sentence.

  • Murder
  • Pointing Of Firearm
  • Identification Evidence
  • Assessors In Criminal Trial
  • Minimum Sentencing
  • Alibi Defence
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [2025] ZAGPPHC 409

Mabena and Another v S (A297/2023)

Mabena and Another v S (A297/2023) [2025] ZAGPPHC 409 (23 April 2025)

The High Court dismissed an appeal against conviction and sentence for robbery with aggravating circumstances, rejecting the appellants’ alibi and sentencing challenges.

  • Robbery With Aggravating Circumstances
  • Minimum Sentencing
  • Alibi Defence
  • Credibility Of Witnesses
  • Appeal Principles
  • Sentencing Discretion
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [2025] ZALMPPHC 71

Mohale v S (Appeal) (A12/2024)

Mohale v S (Appeal) (A12/2024) [2025] ZALMPPHC 71 (14 April 2025)

The High Court dismissed a rape appeal, upholding conviction and life sentence after finding the complainant’s identification credible and the alibi improbable.

  • Rape
  • Sexual Offences Act
  • Minimum Sentencing
  • Single Witness Evidence
  • Admissibility Of Medical Evidence
  • Alibi Defence
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [2025] ZAECMKHC 35

Payne v S (Appeal) (CA&R 182/2023)

Payne v S (Appeal) (CA&R 182/2023) [2025] ZAECMKHC 35 (8 April 2025)

The appeal court found that the trial magistrate, despite not providing in-depth reasons, had thoroughly considered the evidence and was conversant with the applicable onus of proof and the need for caution in identification evidence. The complainant's evidence was found to be clear and satisfactory in all material respects, and her identification of the appellant was credible. The appellant's alibi was not reasonably possibly true, as corroborated by the circumstances and the presence of both accused together. The court held that there were no material contradictions in the state's case and…

  • Rape
  • Identification Evidence
  • Alibi Defence
  • Appeal Procedure
  • Onus Of Proof
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [2025] ZAFSHC 20

Tsimatsima v S (A185/2023)

Tsimatsima v S (A185/2023) [2025] ZAFSHC 20 (28 January 2025)

The High Court dismissed a criminal appeal against conviction and 15-year sentence for housebreaking with intent to rob and robbery with aggravating circumstances.

  • Housebreaking With Intent To Robbery
  • Robbery With Aggravating Circumstances
  • Identification Evidence
  • Minimum Sentencing
  • Alibi Defence
  • Criminal-appeal
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [2024] ZAFSHC 366

Lesetla v S (A66/2024)

Lesetla v S (A66/2024) [2024] ZAFSHC 366 (14 November 2024)

The court found the complainant's evidence to be trustworthy, consistent, and corroborated by medical and aliunde evidence, despite her young age and the absence of other direct witnesses. The appellant's alibi was raised late, not put to witnesses, and lacked credibility. The trial court correctly applied the principles governing single witness evidence and the double cautionary rule, as well as the statutory prohibition against treating sexual offence complainant evidence with undue caution. No substantial and compelling circumstances existed to justify deviation from the prescribed minimum…

  • Rape Of A Child
  • Single Witness Evidence
  • Double Cautionary Rule
  • Minimum Sentencing
  • Alibi Defence
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.