SAMWU v SALGBC and Others (JA 56/13) [2015] ZALAC 117 (24 June 2015)
The Labour Appeal Court held that section 191(5) of the LRA does not give an employee an election to refer a dispute to arbitration after the lapse of 30 days or to await the issue of a certificate of outcome. The right to refer accrues upon the first occurrence of either event, and the referral must be made within a reasonable time, interpreted as 90 days from the lapse of 30 days or the issue of the certificate, whichever occurs first. The appellant acquired the right to refer the dispute to arbitration on expiry of the 30-day period but failed to do so within 90 days and did not seek condonation for the late referral. The Bargaining Council therefore lacked jurisdiction to arbitrate...
- Citation
- [2015] ZALAC 117
- Parties
- Appellant: South African Municipal Workers Union OBO K I Manentza; Respondent: Ngwathe Local Municipality; Respondent: Violet Phatsoane N.O.; Respondent: South African Local Government Bargaining Council
- Court
- Labour Appeal Court
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 24 June 2015
- Case Number
- JA 56/13
- Procedural Posture
- Labour Appeal / Appeal From Labour Court Judgment Reviewing and Setting Aside Jurisdictional Ruling of Arbitrator
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed. Arbitration award correctly reviewed and set aside by the Labour Court. No order as to costs.
- Judges
- Waglay, Dlodlo, Setiloane
- Legal Topics
- Unfair Dismissal, Jurisdiction of Bargaining Council, Condonation for Late Referral, Interpretation of Lra, Conciliation and Arbitration, Reasonable Time for Referral
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
South African Municipal Workers Union OBO K I Manentza
Appellant
Ngwathe Local Municipality
Respondent
Violet Phatsoane N.O.
Respondent
South African Local Government Bargaining Council
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Labour Appeal / Appeal From Labour Court Judgment Reviewing and Setting Aside Jurisdictional Ruling of Arbitrator
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Bargaining Council had jurisdiction to arbitrate the dispute when the referral to arbitration was made outside the prescribed time period without condonation.
- 2 Whether section 191(5) of the LRA gives an employee an election to refer a dispute to arbitration after 30 days or to await the issue of a certificate of outcome.
- 3 Whether the issue of a certificate of outcome is a prerequisite for referral to arbitration or adjudication under the LRA.
Ratio Decidendi
The Labour Appeal Court held that section 191(5) of the LRA does not give an employee an election to refer a dispute to arbitration after the lapse of 30 days or to await the issue of a certificate of outcome. The right to refer accrues upon the first occurrence of either event, and the referral must be made within a reasonable time, interpreted as 90 days from the lapse of 30 days or the issue of the certificate, whichever occurs first. The appellant acquired the right to refer the dispute to arbitration on expiry of the 30-day period but failed to do so within 90 days and did not seek condonation for the late referral. The Bargaining Council therefore lacked jurisdiction to arbitrate...
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed. Arbitration award correctly reviewed and set aside by the Labour Court. No order as to costs.
Orders
- The appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment