Serapelo v Minister of Police (1626/2017) [2024] ZANWHC 57 (1 March 2024)
The court found that the Plaintiff failed to prove negligence or wrongfulness on the part of the Defendant. The evidence established that the police officer, Sergeant Funde, fired rubber bullets to disperse a violent crowd that was pelting stones at police officers and fire fighters, acting in self-defence and to protect state property. The Plaintiff was not intentionally targeted, and the firing of the rubber bullets was justified under the circumstances. The police officer's conduct was reasonable given the imminent threat, and there were no other reasonable measures available to prevent harm. The Plaintiff did not dispute the existence of violent conduct by the crowd, nor did he...
- Citation
- [2024] ZANWHC 57
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Karabelo Serapelo; Defendant: Minister of Police
- Court
- North West High Court, Mafikeng
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 1 March 2024
- Case Number
- 1626/2017
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Trial / Merits Separated From Quantum; Trial on Liability Only
- Outcome
- Plaintiff's claim dismissed; each party to pay its own costs.
- Judges
- M S Moagi
- Legal Topics
- Negligence, Wrongful Conduct, Justification, Public Order Policing, Patrimonial Damages
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Karabelo Serapelo
Plaintiff
Minister of Police
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Trial / Merits Separated From Quantum; Trial on Liability Only
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the police officer who shot the Plaintiff with a rubber bullet acted negligently and wrongfully.
- 2 Whether the police officer was justified in firing the rubber bullet which injured the Plaintiff.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the Plaintiff failed to prove negligence or wrongfulness on the part of the Defendant. The evidence established that the police officer, Sergeant Funde, fired rubber bullets to disperse a violent crowd that was pelting stones at police officers and fire fighters, acting in self-defence and to protect state property. The Plaintiff was not intentionally targeted, and the firing of the rubber bullets was justified under the circumstances. The police officer's conduct was reasonable given the imminent threat, and there were no other reasonable measures available to prevent harm. The Plaintiff did not dispute the existence of violent conduct by the crowd, nor did he...
Court Disposition
Plaintiff's claim dismissed; each party to pay its own costs.
Orders
- The Plaintiff’s claim is dismissed.
- Each party to pay its own costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment