Shongwe v S (991/2019) [2024] ZASCA 127 (26 September 2024)

Shongwe v S (991/2019) [2024] ZASCA 127 (26 September 2024)

The Supreme Court of Appeal found that the high court correctly inferred premeditation from the appellant's conduct, including the tying and suffocation of the deceased, locking of doors, and possession of the deceased's property. The appellant's version that the intention to steal was formed after the killing was rejected, as the facts demonstrated a well-orchestrated plan to kill and rob. The court held that the appellant's actions amounted to premeditated murder and robbery with aggravating circumstances, not mere theft. The appeal against both convictions was dismissed as the evidence overwhelmingly supported the findings of the high court.

Citation
[2024] ZASCA 127
Parties
Appellant: Lindokuhle Percy Shongwe; Respondent: The State
Court
Supreme Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
26 September 2024
Case Number
991/2019
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal From Gauteng Division of the High Court, Johannesburg
Outcome
Appeal dismissed; convictions and sentences confirmed.
Judges
Mabindla-Boqwana, Kgoele, Mantame
Legal Topics
Premeditated Murder, Robbery With Aggravating Circumstances, Asphyxia Due to Ligature Strangulation, Alibi Defence, Intention to Steal
Criminal Law Premeditated Murder Robbery With Aggravating Circumstances Asphyxia Due to Ligature Strangulation Alibi Defence Intention to Steal

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Lindokuhle Percy Shongwe

Appellant

The State

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal From Gauteng Division of the High Court, Johannesburg

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the murder was premeditated.
  2. 2 Whether the appellant was wrongly convicted of robbery with aggravating circumstances instead of theft.
  3. 3 Whether the intention to steal was formed after the killing.

Ratio Decidendi

The Supreme Court of Appeal found that the high court correctly inferred premeditation from the appellant's conduct, including the tying and suffocation of the deceased, locking of doors, and possession of the deceased's property. The appellant's version that the intention to steal was formed after the killing was rejected, as the facts demonstrated a well-orchestrated plan to kill and rob. The court held that the appellant's actions amounted to premeditated murder and robbery with aggravating circumstances, not mere theft. The appeal against both convictions was dismissed as the evidence overwhelmingly supported the findings of the high court.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed; convictions and sentences confirmed.

Orders

  • The appeal is dismissed.
  • The convictions for premeditated murder and robbery with aggravating circumstances are confirmed.