Sibanda and Others Sterkspruit Civic Association (2522/2017) [2017] ZAECMHC 26 (25 July 2017)
The court found that the Sterkspruit Civic Association's constitution did not confer any power to expel members, either expressly or by necessary implication. The disciplinary committee and executive committee acted ultra vires in expelling the applicants and removing them from the party list and council positions. The applicants were denied a fair hearing and the opportunity to appeal to a valid constitutional body. The urgency of the application was justified by the timing of the actionable decision on 24 May 2017. The court held that the applicants were entitled to reinstatement of their membership and interdictory relief restraining the respondents from removing them from the gazetted...
- Citation
- [2017] ZAECMHC 26
- Parties
- Applicant: Sithembile Johannes Sibanda; Applicant: Mninikhaya Jeremiah Madikane; Applicant: Lamllani Mehlomakhulu; Applicant: Lebohang Setsepane; Applicant: Sazi Gungqa; Applicant: Sakhumzi Maqala; Applicant: Chumile Dada; Applicant: Mthetheleli Patrick Mnisi; Applicant: Moeketsi Twoboy Sehloho; Applicant: Mzwanele Mgidlana; Applicant: Mtuvumile Ndoda; Applicant: Wiseman Andisiwe Mkangala; Applicant: Madisema Christina Kibe; Respondent: Sterkspruit Civic Association; Respondent: Mcebisi Ntikelo Mgojo; Respondent: Nokuzola Phama; Respondent: Mthethunjani Yiliwe; Respondent: Alice Dyani; Respondent: Nonzukiso Masupa; Respondent: Koki Shibane; Respondent: Nduna Stuurman; Respondent: Khanyisa Maqungo; Respondent: Noncedo Makaka; Respondent: Bongiwe Ndzaba; Respondent: Pheko Methola; Respondent: Madoda Mvula; Respondent: Thethani Thembile Mkhasakhasa; Respondent: Jackson Mcebisi Mdolomba; Respondent: Nosidima Rozana; Respondent: Melisizwe Kafile; Respondent: The Independent Electoral Commission; Respondent: Speaker, Senqu Local Municipality
- Court
- Eastern Cape High Court, Mthatha
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 25 July 2017
- Case Number
- 2522/2017
- Procedural Posture
- Urgent Application / Final Judgment on Urgent Application
- Outcome
- Application granted in part; applicants' expulsions and removals set aside; certain declaratory and interdictory relief granted; remaining prayers dismissed; costs awarded against first to seventeenth respondents.
- Judges
- Majiki
- Legal Topics
- Voluntary Association Membership, Expulsion of Members, Interdict, Internal Remedies, Municipal Councillor Removal
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Sithembile Johannes Sibanda
Applicant
Mninikhaya Jeremiah Madikane
Applicant
Lamllani Mehlomakhulu
Applicant
Lebohang Setsepane
Applicant
Sazi Gungqa
Applicant
Sakhumzi Maqala
Applicant
Chumile Dada
Applicant
Mthetheleli Patrick Mnisi
Applicant
Moeketsi Twoboy Sehloho
Applicant
Mzwanele Mgidlana
Applicant
Mtuvumile Ndoda
Applicant
Wiseman Andisiwe Mkangala
Applicant
Madisema Christina Kibe
Applicant
Sterkspruit Civic Association
Respondent
Mcebisi Ntikelo Mgojo
Respondent
Nokuzola Phama
Respondent
Mthethunjani Yiliwe
Respondent
Alice Dyani
Respondent
Nonzukiso Masupa
Respondent
Koki Shibane
Respondent
Nduna Stuurman
Respondent
Khanyisa Maqungo
Respondent
Noncedo Makaka
Respondent
Bongiwe Ndzaba
Respondent
Pheko Methola
Respondent
Madoda Mvula
Respondent
Thethani Thembile Mkhasakhasa
Respondent
Jackson Mcebisi Mdolomba
Respondent
Nosidima Rozana
Respondent
Melisizwe Kafile
Respondent
The Independent Electoral Commission
Respondent
Speaker, Senqu Local Municipality
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Urgent Application / Final Judgment on Urgent Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the expulsion of the applicants from the Sterkspruit Civic Association was lawful.
- 2 Whether the removal of applicants from the gazetted election list and council positions was valid.
- 3 Whether the applicants are entitled to reinstatement of membership and council positions.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the Sterkspruit Civic Association's constitution did not confer any power to expel members, either expressly or by necessary implication. The disciplinary committee and executive committee acted ultra vires in expelling the applicants and removing them from the party list and council positions. The applicants were denied a fair hearing and the opportunity to appeal to a valid constitutional body. The urgency of the application was justified by the timing of the actionable decision on 24 May 2017. The court held that the applicants were entitled to reinstatement of their membership and interdictory relief restraining the respondents from removing them from the gazetted...
Court Disposition
Application granted in part; applicants' expulsions and removals set aside; certain declaratory and interdictory relief granted; remaining prayers dismissed; costs awarded against first to seventeenth respondents.
Orders
- The respondents are restrained and interdicted from removing the names of the sixth, eighth, ninth, eleventh, twelfth and thirteenth applicants from the candidates' gazetted election list kept by the eighteenth respondent.
- The eighteenth respondent is restrained and interdicted from giving effect to the resolution expelling the applicants from the SCA and Senqu municipality.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment