Sibanda and Others Sterkspruit Civic Association (2522/2017) [2017] ZAECMHC 26 (25 July 2017)
Court
Eastern Cape High Court, Mthatha
Case number
2522/2017
Judge
Majiki
The court found that the Sterkspruit Civic Association's constitution did not confer any power to expel members, either expressly or by necessary implication. The disciplinary committee and executive committee acted ultra vires in expelling the applicants and removing them from the party list and council positions. The applicants were denied a fair hearing and the opportunity to appeal to a valid constitutional body. The urgency of the application was justified by the timing of the actionable decision on 24 May 2017. The court held that the applicants were entitled to reinstatement of their m…
Montjane and Others v Moloto and Others (75993/13) [2014] ZAGPPHC 129 (20 February 2014)
Court
North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
Case number
75993/13
Judge
Baqwa
The High Court granted an interim interdict preserving the applicants’ municipal council seats pending a review of alleged PAC expulsions and related IEC action.
Mhana and Others v Ngqwebo (CA 65/2011) [2011] ZAECGHC 90 (1 November 2011)
Court
Eastern Cape High Court, Grahamstown
Case number
CA 65/2011
Judges
N. Dambuza, J.J. Nepgen, P.T. Mageza
The High Court held that the municipality was a necessary party, but citation of officials alone did not join it. The appeal partly succeeded and only some relief was set aside.
Dorfling v Independent Democrats and Others (14963/2007) [2007] ZAWCHC 87 (11 June 2007)
Court
Western Cape High Court, Cape Town
Case number
14963/2007
Judge
Steyn
The court found that the applicant's resignation letter, addressed to the party leader, did not constitute a formal resignation under the party constitution, which required such communication to be directed to a recognised party structure. The applicant validly submitted his floor-crossing notification to the IEC during the window period and met the statutory 10% threshold. The decisions of the Municipal Manager and IEC to declare the seat vacant and fill it were based on erroneous assumptions of law and fact and were therefore unlawful and reviewable under PAJA. The court held that jurisdict…