Sibande v Commission for Conciliation Mediation And Arbitration and Others (JR1032/04) [2009] ZALCJHB 25 (30 July 2009)
The Labour Court found that the CCMA Commissioner committed a gross irregularity by accepting the employer's suspicion and external information as conclusive proof of the applicant's status as an illegal immigrant, without requiring proper evidence or following fair procedure. The employer failed to discharge its burden of proof, as no disciplinary hearing was held, no official documents were produced, and the immigration officer did not testify. The High Court had not found the applicant to be a prohibited person, and the prescribed process under the Aliens Control Act was not followed. Consequently, the dismissal was both procedurally and substantively unfair, and the arbitration award...
- Citation
- [2009] ZALCJHB 25
- Parties
- Applicant: Morgan Sibande; Respondent: Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration; Respondent: Commissioner S. Khoza; Respondent: Dunwell Property Services
- Court
- Labour Court Johannesburg
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 30 July 2009
- Case Number
- JR1032/04
- Procedural Posture
- Review Application / Labour Court Review of CCMA Arbitration Award
- Outcome
- Arbitration award reviewed and set aside; dismissal found procedurally and substantively unfair; applicant reinstated.
- Judges
- Molahlehi
- Legal Topics
- Unfair Dismissal, Procedural Fairness, Substantive Fairness, Burden of Proof, Gross Irregularity, Aliens Control Act
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Morgan Sibande
Applicant
Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration
Respondent
Commissioner S. Khoza
Respondent
Dunwell Property Services
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Review Application / Labour Court Review of CCMA Arbitration Award
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the CCMA Commissioner committed a gross irregularity in finding the dismissal of the applicant to be fair.
- 2 Whether the applicant was lawfully declared an illegal immigrant and dismissed on valid grounds.
- 3 Whether the dismissal was procedurally and substantively fair under the Labour Relations Act.
Ratio Decidendi
The Labour Court found that the CCMA Commissioner committed a gross irregularity by accepting the employer's suspicion and external information as conclusive proof of the applicant's status as an illegal immigrant, without requiring proper evidence or following fair procedure. The employer failed to discharge its burden of proof, as no disciplinary hearing was held, no official documents were produced, and the immigration officer did not testify. The High Court had not found the applicant to be a prohibited person, and the prescribed process under the Aliens Control Act was not followed. Consequently, the dismissal was both procedurally and substantively unfair, and the arbitration award...
Court Disposition
Arbitration award reviewed and set aside; dismissal found procedurally and substantively unfair; applicant reinstated.
Orders
- The arbitration award issued by the second respondent on 16 April 2004 under case number GA 21845-03 is reviewed and set aside.
- The dismissal of the applicant was both procedurally and substantively unfair.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment