Spar Group Limited v Coetzee and Others (2022/2183) [2023] ZAGPJHC 561 (21 April 2023)

Spar Group Limited v Coetzee and Others (2022/2183) [2023] ZAGPJHC 561 (21 April 2023)

The court found that the first amendment, clarifying that a branch of Spar includes the Southern Region and that the signatory to the certificates of balance was the relevant credit manager, was properly pleaded and any dispute as to its correctness would be determined at trial. The defendants' objection to this amendment was deemed frivolous and vexatious. Regarding the second amendment, the court held that the inclusion of the Spar Standard Terms of Sale and the specified interest rate did not render the particulars of claim vague or embarrassing, as the cause of action was based on the deeds of suretyship and certificates of balance, not the underlying terms. The plaintiff was not...

Citation
[2023] ZAGPJHC 561
Parties
Applicant: Spar Group Limited; Respondent: Andre Leandra Coetzee; Respondent: Lyn Oswald Coetzee; Respondent: Lawrence Owen Coetzee; Respondent: Sylvia Cynthia Coetzee
Court
South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
21 April 2023
Case Number
2022/2183
Procedural Posture
Leave to Amend / Application for Leave to Amend Particulars of Claim Prior to Trial
Outcome
Leave to amend particulars of claim granted; costs awarded against defendants.
Judges
D I Berger
Legal Topics
Amendment of Pleadings, Suretyship, Certificate of Balance, Interest Rate Dispute, Costs Award
Civil Procedure Commercial and Corporate Amendment of Pleadings Suretyship Certificate of Balance Interest Rate Dispute Costs Award

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Spar Group Limited

Applicant

Andre Leandra Coetzee

Respondent

Lyn Oswald Coetzee

Respondent

Lawrence Owen Coetzee

Respondent

Sylvia Cynthia Coetzee

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Leave to Amend / Application for Leave to Amend Particulars of Claim Prior to Trial

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the plaintiff should be granted leave to amend its particulars of claim to clarify the meaning of 'branch' and include the Spar Southern Region.
  2. 2 Whether the inclusion of the Spar Standard Terms of Sale and the specified interest rate renders the particulars of claim vague and embarrassing.
  3. 3 Whether the defendants' opposition to the amendments was frivolous and vexatious, justifying a costs order.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the first amendment, clarifying that a branch of Spar includes the Southern Region and that the signatory to the certificates of balance was the relevant credit manager, was properly pleaded and any dispute as to its correctness would be determined at trial. The defendants' objection to this amendment was deemed frivolous and vexatious. Regarding the second amendment, the court held that the inclusion of the Spar Standard Terms of Sale and the specified interest rate did not render the particulars of claim vague or embarrassing, as the cause of action was based on the deeds of suretyship and certificates of balance, not the underlying terms. The plaintiff was not...

Court Disposition

Leave to amend particulars of claim granted; costs awarded against defendants.

Orders

  • The plaintiff is granted leave to amend its particulars of claim in the manner set out in the plaintiff's notice of amendment dated 23 March 2022.
  • The reference to annexure 'G' in the plaintiff's notice of amendment dated 23 March 2022 is to be replaced with 'annexure H', and the document headed 'Standard Terms of Sale' is to be marked accordingly.