Download PDF

South Africa Order

Competition Tribunal

Standard Bank Group Limited v Liberty Holdings Limited (LM073Sep21) [2021] ZACT 76 (9 December 2021)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The Tribunal found that Standard Bank Group Limited already exercised control over Liberty Holdings Limited prior to the merger, holding 53.62% of the ordinary shares. The transaction merely increases its shareholding to 100%, granting unfettered sole control but not altering the competitive landscape. The Commission's investigation revealed no substantial change to market structure, no exclusionary conduct, and no adverse effects on employment or public interest. Other regulators approved the transaction and raised no concerns. No third parties objected. Accordingly, the Tribunal concluded that the merger is unlikely to substantially prevent or lessen competition or negatively impact the public interest, and approved the merger unconditionally.

Court disposition

Merger unconditionally approved.

Orders

  • The merger between Standard Bank Group Limited and Liberty Holdings Limited is approved in terms of section 16(2)(a) of the Competition Act, 1998.
  • A Merger Clearance Certificate is to be issued in terms of Competition Tribunal Rule 35(5)(a).

02

Material facts

Parties

Standard Bank Group Limited

Applicant Counsel: H Irvine, L Mabidikane, M Sambo

Liberty Holdings Limited

Respondent Counsel: D Rudman, A Liebenberg

Competition Commission

Respondent Counsel: B Ntshingila

Amounts and remedies

  • Standard Bank Group Limited Pre Merger Shareholding in Liberty Holdings Limited (%): 53.62
  • Standard Bank Group Limited Post Merger Shareholding in Liberty Holdings Limited (%): 100

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Merger Clearance Application / Final Order

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
Standard Bank Group Limited argued that the transaction merely increases its shareholding in Liberty Holdings Limited from 53.62% to 100%, resulting in sole control. The parties have operated as related entities, and the merger will not alter market dynamics or competitive behaviour. The transaction will not adversely affect employment and will promote a greater spread of ownership as Liberty shareholders become Standard Bank shareholders. No public interest concerns arise.
Respondent
The Competition Commission submitted that the proposed transaction is unlikely to result in any substantial change to the market structure or competitive dynamics. The Commission found no evidence that Standard Bank Group Limited or Liberty Holdings Limited would cease dealing with competitors. Other regulators, including the Financial Sector Conduct Authority and Prudential Authority, raised no concerns and approved the transaction. No third parties objected.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Competition Act, 1998, section 16(2)(a)

    A merger may only be prohibited if it is likely to substantially prevent or lessen competition, or if it raises significant public interest concerns.

  2. 02

    Financial Sector Conduct Authority and Prudential Authority approvals

    Regulatory approval from sectoral regulators is required for certain transactions, and their lack of objection supports the merger's lawfulness.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The Tribunal found that Standard Bank Group Limited already exercised control over Liberty Holdings Limited prior to the merger, holding 53.62% of the ordinary shares. The transaction merely increases its shareholding to 100%, granting unfettered sole control but not altering the competitive landscape. The Commission's investigation revealed no substantial change to market structure, no exclusionary conduct, and no adverse effects on employment or public interest. Other regulators approved the transaction and raised no concerns. No third parties objected. Accordingly, the Tribunal concluded that the merger is unlikely to substantially prevent or lessen competition or negatively impact the public interest, and approved the merger unconditionally.

Obiter and limits

  • The merger is likely to promote a greater spread of ownership as Liberty Holdings Limited shareholders become Standard Bank Group Limited shareholders.
  • No public interest concerns were identified, and the transaction raises no employment issues.

Court disposition

Merger unconditionally approved.

  • The merger between Standard Bank Group Limited and Liberty Holdings Limited is approved in terms of section 16(2)(a) of the Competition Act, 1998.
  • A Merger Clearance Certificate is to be issued in terms of Competition Tribunal Rule 35(5)(a).

Source and reliance status

Competition Tribunal

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

Competition Tribunal

Order

[2021] ZACT 76

COMPETITION

TRIBUNAL OF SOUTH AFRICA

Case No.: LM073Sep21

In the matter between:

Standard Bank Group Limited

Primary Acquiring Firm

And

Liberty Holdings Limited

Primary Target Firm

Panel:

E Daniels (Presiding Member)

I Valodia (Tribunal Panel Member)

T Vilakazi Tribunal Panel Member)

Heard on:

9 December 2021

Order Issued on: 9 December 2021

Reasons Issued on: 9 December 2021

ORDER

Further to the recommendation of the Competition Commission in terms of section 14A(1)(b) of the Competition Act, 1998 (“the Act”) the Competition Tribunal orders that–

1. the merger between the abovementioned parties be approved in terms of section 16(2)(a) of the Act; and

2. a Merger Clearance Certificate be issued in terms of Competition Tribunal Rule 35(5)(a).

9 December 2021

Presiding Member Date

Mr Enver Daniels

COMPETITION TRIBUNAL OF

SOUTH AFRICA

Case no: LM073Sep21

Standard Bank Group Limited (Primary Acquiring Firm)

Liberty Holdings Limited (Primary Target Firm)

REASONS FOR DECISION

[1] On 9 December 2021, the Competition Tribunal unconditionally approved a large merger between Standard Bank Group Limited and Liberty Holdings Limited.

[2] The transaction involves Standard Bank Group Limited acquiring the remainder of the ordinary shares which it does not already hold in Liberty Holdings Limited to increase its shareholding from 53.62% to 100%. Standard Bank Group Limited will also acquire all the preference shares in Liberty Holdings Limited.

[3] Pre-merger, Standard Bank Group Limited holds 53.62% of the ordinary shares in Liberty Holdings Limited. Given that Standard Bank Group Limited already controls Liberty Holdings Limited and the proposed transaction only seeks to increase its shareholding to 100% giving Standard Bank Group Limited unfettered sole control over Liberty

Holdings Limited, and further, that the two entities have to an appreciable extent, been operating as related entities.

[4] The Competition Commission found that the proposed transaction is unlikely to result in any substantial change to the market structure and that the proposed transaction is unlikely to result in either Standard Bank Group Limited or Liberty Holdings Limited not dealing with each other’s competitors.

[5] The proposed transaction also required approval from other regulators including the Financial Sector Conduct Authority and the Prudential Authority. The Financial Sector Conduct Authority and Prudential

Authority did not raise any concerns regarding the transaction and have provided their approvals for the transaction.

[6] The proposed transaction will not have an adverse effect on employment and it is likely that the promotion of a greater spread of ownership will occur as Standard Bank Group Limited’s local indirect shareholder base will grow as a result of Liberty Holdings Limited shareholders becoming Standard Bank Group Limited shareholders. The merger also raises no other public interest concerns.

[7] No third party raised any concerns.

[8] We concluded that the proposed transaction is unlikely to substantially prevent or lessen competition in any relevant market, or to have a negative impact on the public interest.

09 December 2021

Mr Enver Daniels

Date

Mr Imraan Valodia and Mr Thando Vilakazi concurring

Tribunal Case Manager:

J Munyembate

For the Merging Parties:

H Irvine, L Mabidikane and M Sambo of Bowman Gilfillan and D Rudman and A Liebenberg of Webber Wentzel

For the Competition Commission: B Ntshingila

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Competition Act, 1998

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.